Soldato
- Joined
- 11 Mar 2013
- Posts
- 5,587
I mean this is trolling...Come on Fury I'm sure will rock the boat somewhat.
I sure hope I'm wrong, but with AMD's track record I'm probably not far off.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
I mean this is trolling...Come on Fury I'm sure will rock the boat somewhat.
Yeah but it's cool when Nvidia do it, re-branding is fine yo. Apparently the semantics over the naming is making people lose their minds. It's just to complicated for some people.
Fury X (Flagship)
Fury Pro (Second card down)
390X (Mid - High end)
Posting that above to help people, as a lot here seem to be worried about that people buying a $389 / £250 card from best buy or PC world accidentally thinking it's the AMD: 980 Ti / Titan X equivalent.
He's right though. This 390x is more power hungry. It's going to be a hotter card spared the improved cooling. At least the 8800GT was faster and priced underneath the GTX at the same time of its reign. Making it seem like a damn good card. It was also a single slot cooler.
Compared to this kettle of fish..more than a year later, a ton of cards under the competitions belt and it's exactly the same card! LOL.
All rebrands are uninteresting, some are just a lot more senseless than others
The 8800GT and 8800GTS 512MB cards were rebranded against better AMD cards like the HD4830,HD4850,HD5770 and so on.
Also,hotness argument is just getting boring - the 9000 series Nvidia cards were rated for well over 100C. My mates single slot 9800GT could run very hot and it was in a SFF PC,so it was running well into the 90s for YEARS.
HD4870 cards ran hot and still were fine. Had mates with hot running GTX470 cards which lasted for years. The Titan X runs quite hot. Some of the pre-overclocked GTX970 cards could run hot. I have used SFF PCs since 2005 - all my cards have run hotter than average and have been fine for years.
As long as the card does not throttle and the capacitors are good quality solid jobbies,the cards will last for years.
Nobody is ditching their Haswell CPUs since they run hot. Most owners of Haswell CPUs in the world are using stock coolers,meaning they are run into the 80s and 90s quite easily if stressed.
Heat production is another thing - but people seem to be interchangeably using waste heat production and hotness when they are NOT the same things.
And so on? The 5770 didn't come till 2 years later. The 8880GT was primarily set up against the 2900XT and 1950XTX. TITAN X is a 250w part, power consumption on the 390X is considerably higher, for less performance.
This is where arguments arise. Lack of facts and sound logical reasoning! Thankfully it's difficult to argue further with such logic so I will leave you to your devices.
The exhaust from my 9800-GX2 was so hot that it stripped the paint of the skirting board behind the tower![]()
Heat contained within the die?! 5C knocking years of components?
Would love to see some concrete evidence for that. Not to mention you contradict yourself.
Well, now we can get back to the topic at hand, a lot of people seem to be getting very hung up on 4GB not being enough for 4K, a thing to remember though is that 4K accounts for a ridiculous low portion of the market, over two thirds of the worlds computers run 1080p or lower anyway. So by saving money on the VRAM but making it super fast, AMD seem to be gearing the Fury for dominance at the resolutions most people game at, which from a business pov looks like a good plan to me.
What the hell is this crap?
The uniformed having been buying products stupidly for as long as trading has existed? Why so worried now about uniformed buyers?
If you are spending £300-£400 on something and don't do any research into the purchase then you are an idiot. 2 minutes on google would have showing that "poor guy" that the 390x was not the top of the line card.
the 390X was always Water Cooled and the Air Cooled version will still not look like a 290X, simply because it'll have a much shorter board........i think
AMD's top range card will need to be at least 80% as fast as my 2x 290x or i simply wont bother updating :/
AMD's top range card will need to be at least 80% as fast as my 2x 290x or i simply wont bother updating :/
WTB magical Intel CPU's please that lock the heat inside the die. Will pay with whatever remains of my soul or could also part exchange for these magical beans, new and unused, I bought last week.!
Well aftermarket 980ti's are slated to be ~90% of the R9 295x2, so if Fury matches the 980ti you should be in luck.
I read somewhere ( maybe on here ) the Fury X will run at 1750 on the core. Could that possible be true?
I read somewhere ( maybe on here ) the Fury X will run at 1750 on the core. Could that possible be true?
£345 + delivery for the 390X, think I'll pass![]()