Possible Radeon 390X / 390 and 380X Spec / Benchmark (do not hotlink images!!!!!!)

Mynight · 16 Jun 2015 at 18:16

Boffo said:
How easy will it intergrate into my custom loop?

Easy enough once the compatible blocks are out.

Klunt Bumskrint · 16 Jun 2015 at 18:16

Surprised to see them going on about Mantle at the end

meldarthx · 16 Jun 2015 at 18:16

Joop said:
She said 4k @ 45FPS?

try 5k at 45fps

Protoype · 16 Jun 2015 at 18:16

http://www.amd.com/en-gb/products/graphics/desktop/r9#

its up now

LoadsaMoney · 16 Jun 2015 at 18:16

Stunning!

Brumboy · 16 Jun 2015 at 18:16

So umm when are we going to see UK prices & benchmarks?!

thebennyboy · 16 Jun 2015 at 18:17

AMD site is dead.

EDIT: Nvm, just very slow.

Boomstick777 · 16 Jun 2015 at 18:17

Loxa said:
He said 45 FPS

She said, 45fps @ 5K in 'High' mode.

She said, 60fps @ 4K in Highest mode.

Gripen90 · 16 Jun 2015 at 18:17

Hmm... I just watched this till the end and.... I ordered my 3rd MSI GTX 980Ti

FinglisHobbit · 16 Jun 2015 at 18:17

Unless its the dual card the Titan X will still be fastest. However if its faster than the Ti then they are onto a winner at that price.

The Nano is pretty awesome too.

Kaapstad · 16 Jun 2015 at 18:17

Klunt Bumskrint said:
But at no point said fastest GPU or most powerful GPU for the fury X

Reading between the lines the Fury X will compete directly with the 980 Ti on price and performance.

TNA · 16 Jun 2015 at 18:17

Jokester said:
So £500 for a card that might be slightly quicker than the 980Ti assuming the benchmarks back it up, but still 300W or so?

That is the water cooled version. Aircooled one should be under £400 I think.

Also some new tech. HBM

Scramz · 16 Jun 2015 at 18:17

Loxa said:
He said 45 FPS

45fps was in 5K

Wizzfizz · 16 Jun 2015 at 18:17

Thresh

sophslump · 16 Jun 2015 at 18:17

Toss3 said:
No you are not. There's definitely a reason for the $649 price. Great card nonetheless (if it lives up to the hype)!

Then, in that case, Nvidia can slash prices on the 980ti and Titan X, and still compete. Also, Titan X has a lower TDP than Fury X (250w vs 275w, I think) so the efficiency stuff they were gushing about isn't a deathblow to Nvidia.

Greebo · 16 Jun 2015 at 18:17

Titan x only does 26 fps on Tomb Raider at ultra details on 4k. If the fury x does 60 fps then AMD have nailed it

Dicehunter · 16 Jun 2015 at 18:18

D.P. said:
Indeed, as far as I can tell through all the hot air is there is a 980 competitor and a 980TI competitor, as expected. Nothing that looks to beat the Titan X, as predicted.
And the 4GB rumours were true.

The price is somewhat telling. AMD is going for the value for money approach again.

Well their dual GPU will but I have a feeling Nvidia will release a dual Titan X card soon.

Jokester · 16 Jun 2015 at 18:18

Rossuk89 said:
So umm when are we going to see UK prices & benchmarks?!

Price will be at least £500 (that's the straight dollar conversion + VAT), I suspect it'll be over £550 though in the short term.

Didn't see the Nano, but that is probably the star of this reveal to be honest.

CAT-THE-FIFTH · 16 Jun 2015 at 18:18

FoxEye said:
Everything I said was a quote from her too

So she said

"1/2 the watts of 290X"

"2x perf per watt"

"More powerful than 290X"

Something doesn't add up!

Probably a a few percent faster than a R9 290X but at half the wattage,so it has around twice the performance per watt.

LoadsaMoney · 16 Jun 2015 at 18:18

Im going Fury X!