Woman eats cereal while driving her Land Rover


Crap crap crapety crap crap crap... now I have to go back and edit every single post :(



Although... I have to admit... this is the most the dailyfail has ever made me laugh:
Let’s face it, there are few human traits more unattractive than smugness.
The woman who emerges from her changing room to inform the sales assistant — and anyone within earshot — that she thinks she might need a smaller size; the person next to you at dinner whose bread roll remains untouched; the smirk of the parking ticket attendant as he watches you careering unflatteringly along the pavement, safe in the knowledge his commission is in the bank.
All maddening. But there is one creature whose smugness exceeds all of these. A creature so infuriatingly, throat-throttlingly, red-mist-inducingly smug that even a vegan yoga teacher might feel the urge to slap them across the chops with an organic celery stick: the militant cyclist.
 
Slow moving traffic is the worst, because you get the situation where a motorist will suddenly dart up a side road because he thinks it might get him there quicker. He won't check his mirrors or indicate, and if a cyclist happens to be filtering he get's no warning at all. Kerblammo.
 
No... just someone who is feddup of idiots like you helping to enforce the peculiar nanny state crap that is supposedly trying to protect us from ourselves.

I'm not trying to enforce a "nanny state". I would just like people to drive responsibly and within the law, neither of which she is doing. But I'm the idiot for wanting this?
 
The fact I do understand how dangerous it is, is the reason I don't cycle to work. Unlike the people who do, who don't ;)

If you understand why did you claim earlier that you are exactly like the women in question in this thread? Don't you care at all about other users of the road?
 
Last edited:
The fact I do understand how dangerous it is, is the reason I don't cycle to work. Unlike the people who do, who don't ;)

And why is it dangerous to cycle to work? Because of people not paying attention to the road, like this cereal-munching *******.
 
And why is it dangerous to cycle to work? Because of people not paying attention to the road, like this cereal-munching *******.

I've already said that range rovers are fitted with sensors and have avoidance detection systems. If cyclists can't see a range rover (they are kinda big) then they need to perhaps remove their head bandanas, sunglasses, go-pros, headphones etc etc and pay better attention
 
assuming I'm the only one in the car (assumptions eh)

anyway why on earth would I pay road tax and car insurance only to then walk to work :eek: and walking!!!! are you mad!!!! Much rather sit in my v8 gas guzzling range rover for an hour

it's also easier to eat my cereals when sitting down in the car than walking

lol at saving the environment though, I used to recycle everything until I realised that as quickly as I'd recycle, more junk mail and flyers were posted through my door. It was a losing battle, so I gave up and now collect it all and dump it at the side of the road once a month.

I would laugh if that was funny. But it wasn't.
 
The fact I do understand how dangerous it is, is the reason I don't cycle to work. Unlike the people who do, who don't ;)

Indeed, the risk of being killed (Per mile) on a bicycle is equivalent to being not only over the DUI limit, but well over it!

I have always been puzzled as to why it is considered legally/morally acceptable to carry a young child pillion on a bicycle! A child in a baby seat in a car driven by a significantly drunk driver is actually in a much safer place!

(Not an unreasonable comparison since the greatest risk from DUI is actually to the driver, IIRC 60-70% of DUI fatalities are actually the driver or his passengers, the idea that DUI casualties are all innocent bystanders is something of a myth)
 
I've already said that range rovers are fitted with sensors and have avoidance detection systems. If cyclists can't see a range rover (they are kinda big) then they need to perhaps remove their head bandanas, sunglasses, go-pros, headphones etc etc and pay better attention

And Range Rovers are the only vehicles are on the road? And it's always the cyclist who hits the car, not the other way round?
 
I'm not trying to enforce a "nanny state". I would just like people to drive responsibly and within the law, neither of which she is doing. But I'm the idiot for wanting this?

Which law is she breaking?

I see the cyclist cause at minimum 3 unique infractions...

If you understand why did you claim earlier that you are exactly like the women in question in this thread? Don't you care at all about other users of the road?

It's the cyclist who appears to not care about any road user other than himself...
 
I'm not trying to enforce a "nanny state". I would just like people to drive responsibly and within the law, neither of which she is doing. But I'm the idiot for wanting this?

First off you're not an idiot, just in the minority which is understandable considering the amount of drivers compared to cyclists there are on the roads

If there were more cycle paths then things would be much better
 
Indeed, the risk of being killed (Per mile) on a bicycle is equivalent to being not only over the DUI limit, but well over it!

I have always been puzzled as to why it is considered legally/morally acceptable to carry a young child pillion on a bicycle! A child in a baby seat in a car driven by a significantly drunk driver is actually in a much safer place!

(Not an unreasonable comparison since the greatest risk from DUI is actually to the driver, IIRC 60-70% of DUI fatalities are actually the driver or his passengers, the idea that DUI casualties are all innocent bystanders is something of a myth)

Drunk cyclist vs drunk driver...

WwkW5eD.png
 
She's likely been doing that route for months/years & knows the conditions... hence knows she can take her breakfast with her without causing any trouble to anyone. Did she cause an accident?

Road conditions and circumstances change all the time, sometime in a split second. Road users should never assume otherwise.
 
And Range Rovers are the only vehicles are on the road? And it's always the cyclist who hits the car, not the other way round?

"They're made out of meat."

"Meat?"

"Meat. They're made out of meat."

"Meat?"

"There's no doubt about it. We picked up several from different parts of the planet, took them aboard our recon vessels, and probed them all the way through. They're completely meat."

"That's impossible. What about the radio signals? The messages to the stars?"

"They use the radio waves to talk, but the signals don't come from them. The signals come from machines."

"So who made the machines? That's who we want to contact."

"They made the machines. That's what I'm trying to tell you. Meat made the machines."

"That's ridiculous. How can meat make a machine? You're asking me to believe in sentient meat."

"I'm not asking you, I'm telling you. These creatures are the only sentient race in that sector and they're made out of meat."

"Maybe they're like the orfolei. You know, a carbon-based intelligence that goes through a meat stage."

"Nope. They're born meat and they die meat. We studied them for several of their life spans, which didn't take long. Do you have any idea what's the life span of meat?"

"Spare me. Okay, maybe they're only part meat. You know, like the weddilei. A meat head with an electron plasma brain inside."

"Nope. We thought of that, since they do have meat heads, like the weddilei. But I told you, we probed them. They're meat all the way through."

"No brain?"

"Oh, there's a brain all right. It's just that the brain is made out of meat! That's what I've been trying to tell you."

< 2 >
"So ... what does the thinking?"

"You're not understanding, are you? You're refusing to deal with what I'm telling you. The brain does the thinking. The meat."

"Thinking meat! You're asking me to believe in thinking meat!"

"Yes, thinking meat! Conscious meat! Loving meat. Dreaming meat. The meat is the whole deal! Are you beginning to get the picture or do I have to start all over?"

"Omigod. You're serious then. They're made out of meat."

"Thank you. Finally. Yes. They are indeed made out of meat. And they've been trying to get in touch with us for almost a hundred of their years."

"Omigod. So what does this meat have in mind?"

"First it wants to talk to us. Then I imagine it wants to explore the Universe, contact other sentiences, swap ideas and information. The usual."

"We're supposed to talk to meat."

"That's the idea. That's the message they're sending out by radio. 'Hello. Anyone out there. Anybody home.' That sort of thing."

"They actually do talk, then. They use words, ideas, concepts?"

"Oh, yes. Except they do it with meat."

"I thought you just told me they used radio."

"They do, but what do you think is on the radio? Meat sounds. You know how when you slap or flap meat, it makes a noise? They talk by flapping their meat at each other. They can even sing by squirting air through their meat."

"Omigod. Singing meat. This is altogether too much. So what do you advise?"

"Officially or unofficially?"

< 3 >
"Both."

"Officially, we are required to contact, welcome and log in any and all sentient races or multibeings in this quadrant of the Universe, without prejudice, fear or favor. Unofficially, I advise that we erase the records and forget the whole thing."

"I was hoping you would say that."

"It seems harsh, but there is a limit. Do we really want to make contact with meat?"

"I agree one hundred percent. What's there to say? 'Hello, meat. How's it going?' But will this work? How many planets are we dealing with here?"

"Just one. They can travel to other planets in special meat containers, but they can't live on them. And being meat, they can only travel through C space. Which limits them to the speed of light and makes the possibility of their ever making contact pretty slim. Infinitesimal, in fact."

"So we just pretend there's no one home in the Universe."

"That's it."

"Cruel. But you said it yourself, who wants to meet meat? And the ones who have been aboard our vessels, the ones you probed? You're sure they won't remember?"

"They'll be considered crackpots if they do. We went into their heads and smoothed out their meat so that we're just a dream to them."

"A dream to meat! How strangely appropriate, that we should be meat's dream."

"And we marked the entire sector unoccupied."

"Good. Agreed, officially and unofficially. Case closed. Any others? Anyone interesting on that side of the galaxy?"

"Yes, a rather shy but sweet hydrogen core cluster intelligence in a class nine star in G445 zone. Was in contact two galactic rotations ago, wants to be friendly again."

< 4 >
"They always come around."

"And why not? Imagine how unbearably, how unutterably cold the Universe would be if one were all alone ..."

the end



This story originally appeared in Omni April 1991 and was nominated for the Nebula Award. It is taken from the collection 'Bears Discover Fire', available here. You can find out more about Terry Bisson on his website.
 
Range Rovers are king of the road, they are the lion of the urban jungle

If you were a hyena, you wouldn't pick a fight with a lion would you
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom