Prescriptions to display drug cost

Good idea to show people how much their medication truly costs. I work in a pharmacy and many complain that £8.20 is too "high" even though their prescribed medication is priced twice or triple the the £8.20 they pay.
 
My asthma nurse had me trying a bunch of different medications because the one i was on was supposedly expensive. Had a loads of problems when i switched to flutiform, eventually settled on a lower dose of the medication (seretide) i was using to start with.
 
is there still an angle here for some GPs/Pharmasists to go with private prescriptions for things that cost less than the standard prescription charge
 
Making sick people feel guilty for receiving treatment? What an utterly callous idea.

Maybe every interview with a member of the cabinet should start with a reminder of how much they're costing the tax payer.

How many genuinely ill people would feel guilty? I don't care how much something costs - I am not going to feel guilty if what I take is going to keep me alive.
Those that whine about the pathetic £8.20 cost will be able to get appreciation on the real cost.
Rather than feel guilty I would actually be rather relieved that I am finally getting something back for all the money I have paid in (as someone who pretty much never visits doctors I am one of the few not actually diretly benefiting)

Course, while I think it is a fine idea, I don't see it achieving anything financially.
 
Course, while I think it is a fine idea, I don't see it achieving anything financially.

I'm not sure which camp I fall into, while I think people should have some awareness and appreciate the cost of their medication. I'm not convinced this is the way to go about it. What next, break a leg and get an invoice telling you what it would have cost you to get your treatment privately. Same for when you gran is in hospital with pneumonia for 2-3 weeks?

I do think there is a case of billing people directly for the use/abuse of the NHS. Role up drunk on a Fri/Sat night and want a bed to sleep it off. No problem, £500+ a night
 
Those who need it won't care, those who abuse it probably won't care, and those who are not sure if they need it but take it as it's available will probably think twice.

This. I've no problem with it but will probably only have an impact on a minority.

in fairness that is only likely to be your view as I am assuming you aren't in the situation you talk about above. I'm quite sure someone on medication that was prolonging their life wouldn't really be worrying too much the cost to the NHS (assuming the quality of life was there and even if it wasn't their primary concern is very unlikely to be the cost to the taxpayer/NHS)

I have with my partner. She was given a drug that wasn't on the NICE list. 2 boxes cost the same as a new hatchback. The meds per day was close to 30 pills. Her overall costs in the last few months had to be close to 5 figures per month including home care, scans etc etc. I honestly don't mean to sound selfish or uppity but apart from the shock of the expensive pills, I wasn't really thinking too hard about the cost. Worked it out after but then I had more time after.
 
Wildman, never mentioned recycling of drugs. Just the labelling of the costs to try and reduce wastage.
 
is there still an angle here for some GPs/Pharmasists to go with private prescriptions for things that cost less than the standard prescription charge

apparantly we are not allowed to do this now. our pharmacist service advised that this is something potentially being cracked down on by counter fraud departments. If they are elligible to pay for a script then they must pay even if it is more expensive than a private script if it is being issued by an NHS contractor. This particularly has become relevant when viagra came off patent as a private script for viagra is now much cheaper than an NHS script when it used to be very much the other way round.
 
I'm not sure which camp I fall into, while I think people should have some awareness and appreciate the cost of their medication. I'm not convinced this is the way to go about it. What next, break a leg and get an invoice telling you what it would have cost you to get your treatment privately. Same for when you gran is in hospital with pneumonia for 2-3 weeks?

I do think there is a case of billing people directly for the use/abuse of the NHS. Role up drunk on a Fri/Sat night and want a bed to sleep it off. No problem, £500+ a night

I actually wouldn't mind that either. 'Wow, it would have cost me HOW MUCH privately?! Thank god for the NHS' rather than see it as a guilt trip I would see it as a way of educating people into appreciating what we have.

Same goes for when people are outraged that their mother/friend/whatever was stuck on a waiting list for a year to get the operation they needed and how it is a disgrace. Well, take a look at the bill and remember you could have gone and avoided the massive wait by going private if you were willing to pay for it.

My wife is American and a Diabetic. Her insulin was costing $350 a MONTH and that was after the cost was covered by the full coverage insurance she had via employment. So, yeah, I think it is time people got a wake up call into how good we have it.
 
It's been mentioned here already but the whole I've paid in' therefore 'I'm entitled' attitude only for the NHS breeds this wastefulness. People should consider it year on year not that they paid in when it was black and what and in analogue decades ago entitles them to treatment now and going forward.

You don't think that way for car and house insurance or private medical cover so why the NHS?

Exactly. The whole Welfare State is a glorified pyramid/ponzi scheme, which relies on a large working population paying enough tax & NI to care for those old, infirm and 'less fortunate'. I'm fed up of the attitude of the older generation that there's somehow a 'pot' with their name on it, conveniently forgetting that their parents and grandparents all of a sudden got medical treatment and other benefits having never paid any NI or 'stamp' in their lives...
 
How many genuinely ill people would feel guilty? I don't care how much something costs - I am not going to feel guilty if what I take is going to keep me alive.

Many old and vulnerable people already feel like a burden. This is only going to exacerbate those feelings.
 
Returning used drugs into the system would be an absolute minefield and require extremely tight regulation which would probably be almost as costly as the waste.

It's not the cost to manufacture the drugs that make them expensive anyway it's the RND so I doubt reusing medicine even if it were practical would be cost effective.

most things probably cost a few pence to make.

maybe the government should require anyone who sells something to put the manufacturing cost on it so we can see how ripped off we are by the actual sale price to us.

it would be a real eye opener walking around a supermarket.
 
I actually wouldn't mind that either. 'Wow, it would have cost me HOW MUCH privately?! Thank god for the NHS' rather than see it as a guilt trip I would see it as a way of educating people into appreciating what we have.

Same goes for when people are outraged that their mother/friend/whatever was stuck on a waiting list for a year to get the operation they needed and how it is a disgrace. Well, take a look at the bill and remember you could have gone and avoided the massive wait by going private if you were willing to pay for it.

My wife is American and a Diabetic. Her insulin was costing $350 a MONTH and that was after the cost was covered by the full coverage insurance she had via employment. So, yeah, I think it is time people got a wake up call into how good we have it.

:rolleyes: it's not how good we have it in your wife's case, it's a case of how ****'d up the U.S. Healthcare system is
 
It's not the cost to manufacture the drugs that make them expensive anyway it's the RND so I doubt reusing medicine even if it were practical would be cost effective.

most things probably cost a few pence to make.

maybe the government should require anyone who sells something to put the manufacturing cost on it so we can see how ripped off we are by the actual sale price to us.

it would be a real eye opener walking around a supermarket.

Most Pharma companies spend more on advertising and marketing than they do on R&D. The biggest spending twice as much on advertising than R&D.

So yeah, R&D isn't the reason why it's so expensive.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-28212223?
 
maybe the government should require anyone who sells something to put the manufacturing cost on it so we can see how ripped off we are by the actual sale price to us.QUOTE]

I take this figure would include the associated costs for 100+ compounds that were develooped, tested and failed before the company identified this marketed drug? The manufacturing costs for a single tablet is a fairly meaningless figure.
 
is there still an angle here for some GPs/Pharmasists to go with private prescriptions for things that cost less than the standard prescription charge

No half decent pharmacist would allow you to pay £8.20 for something worth less than that available off the shelf.

However, you'd be surprised at the amount of people who will still insist on taking the branded products even when theirs an unbranded one available for a fraction of the cost.
 
maybe the government should require anyone who sells something to put the manufacturing cost on it so we can see how ripped off we are by the actual sale price to us.QUOTE]

I take this figure would include the associated costs for 100+ compounds that were develooped, tested and failed before the company identified this marketed drug? The manufacturing costs for a single tablet is a fairly meaningless figure.
I meant every day items as well

such as brand tshirt £30 manufacturing and shipping cost like £5

loads of drugs where the patent has expired are a rip off though.
 
Back
Top Bottom