Making sick people feel guilty for receiving treatment? What an utterly callous idea.
Maybe every interview with a member of the cabinet should start with a reminder of how much they're costing the tax payer.
Course, while I think it is a fine idea, I don't see it achieving anything financially.
Those who need it won't care, those who abuse it probably won't care, and those who are not sure if they need it but take it as it's available will probably think twice.
in fairness that is only likely to be your view as I am assuming you aren't in the situation you talk about above. I'm quite sure someone on medication that was prolonging their life wouldn't really be worrying too much the cost to the NHS (assuming the quality of life was there and even if it wasn't their primary concern is very unlikely to be the cost to the taxpayer/NHS)
is there still an angle here for some GPs/Pharmasists to go with private prescriptions for things that cost less than the standard prescription charge
I'm not sure which camp I fall into, while I think people should have some awareness and appreciate the cost of their medication. I'm not convinced this is the way to go about it. What next, break a leg and get an invoice telling you what it would have cost you to get your treatment privately. Same for when you gran is in hospital with pneumonia for 2-3 weeks?
I do think there is a case of billing people directly for the use/abuse of the NHS. Role up drunk on a Fri/Sat night and want a bed to sleep it off. No problem, £500+ a night
It's been mentioned here already but the whole I've paid in' therefore 'I'm entitled' attitude only for the NHS breeds this wastefulness. People should consider it year on year not that they paid in when it was black and what and in analogue decades ago entitles them to treatment now and going forward.
You don't think that way for car and house insurance or private medical cover so why the NHS?
How many genuinely ill people would feel guilty? I don't care how much something costs - I am not going to feel guilty if what I take is going to keep me alive.
Returning used drugs into the system would be an absolute minefield and require extremely tight regulation which would probably be almost as costly as the waste.
I actually wouldn't mind that either. 'Wow, it would have cost me HOW MUCH privately?! Thank god for the NHS' rather than see it as a guilt trip I would see it as a way of educating people into appreciating what we have.
Same goes for when people are outraged that their mother/friend/whatever was stuck on a waiting list for a year to get the operation they needed and how it is a disgrace. Well, take a look at the bill and remember you could have gone and avoided the massive wait by going private if you were willing to pay for it.
My wife is American and a Diabetic. Her insulin was costing $350 a MONTH and that was after the cost was covered by the full coverage insurance she had via employment. So, yeah, I think it is time people got a wake up call into how good we have it.
Bet they don't display it on prescriptions which cost less than the NHS charge, like my asthma inhaler![]()
It's not the cost to manufacture the drugs that make them expensive anyway it's the RND so I doubt reusing medicine even if it were practical would be cost effective.
most things probably cost a few pence to make.
maybe the government should require anyone who sells something to put the manufacturing cost on it so we can see how ripped off we are by the actual sale price to us.
it would be a real eye opener walking around a supermarket.
maybe the government should require anyone who sells something to put the manufacturing cost on it so we can see how ripped off we are by the actual sale price to us.QUOTE]
I take this figure would include the associated costs for 100+ compounds that were develooped, tested and failed before the company identified this marketed drug? The manufacturing costs for a single tablet is a fairly meaningless figure.
is there still an angle here for some GPs/Pharmasists to go with private prescriptions for things that cost less than the standard prescription charge
I meant every day items as wellmaybe the government should require anyone who sells something to put the manufacturing cost on it so we can see how ripped off we are by the actual sale price to us.QUOTE]
I take this figure would include the associated costs for 100+ compounds that were develooped, tested and failed before the company identified this marketed drug? The manufacturing costs for a single tablet is a fairly meaningless figure.
such as brand tshirt £30 manufacturing and shipping cost like £5
loads of drugs where the patent has expired are a rip off though.