It's definitely a car you'd need to drive before commiting to
I'd personally just pick the cheapest of the two as I can't believe there's that much in it going by the base cars.
Voice control in the fiesta is a bit of a gimmick, ours is crap and slow (though maybe it's been improved in later cars) and one thing that absolutely infuriates me in the Ford is the placement of the window switches - bizarrely far back. The climates system is terrible, can't judge internal tempreature well at all. It also pitches and rolls way more than I would like (despite ultimately being quite grippy), but that's probably fixed in the ST - plus jumping out of the Type R most cars move around a lot more.
On the other hand even with 90ish bhp our one feels quite lively, it's got more width to it interior wise than most cars of its size and it's got a nice gearbox despite having a bit of a long throw.
Both the Pug and Ford seem to be at the top of the pile of little hot hatches, can't see the op going wrong with either
I'd personally just pick the cheapest of the two as I can't believe there's that much in it going by the base cars.
Voice control in the fiesta is a bit of a gimmick, ours is crap and slow (though maybe it's been improved in later cars) and one thing that absolutely infuriates me in the Ford is the placement of the window switches - bizarrely far back. The climates system is terrible, can't judge internal tempreature well at all. It also pitches and rolls way more than I would like (despite ultimately being quite grippy), but that's probably fixed in the ST - plus jumping out of the Type R most cars move around a lot more.
On the other hand even with 90ish bhp our one feels quite lively, it's got more width to it interior wise than most cars of its size and it's got a nice gearbox despite having a bit of a long throw.
Both the Pug and Ford seem to be at the top of the pile of little hot hatches, can't see the op going wrong with either