Gp staff are overpaid and overworked. I think we should differentiate between gp and hospital staff. They are not the same. Hospital staff already work on weekends as far as I understand it. Its the gp staff that are never open and don't work weekends. Do nurses in hospitals work more than 40 hours a week excluding overtime? I know its shift work buy not sure if they get days off?
If they cant find people to do the job then hey should look at the barriers to entry and the fact that the work is none stop because its free there is never ending demand from the customer/patient side.
Surgeons should not have to work weekends in my opinion because it is an advanded skill and in the private sector they would be setting their own employment terms because their skill is in such a demand. Compared to a gp nurse or doctor who have it easy at the moment in terms of what their value would be in a free market.
nurses in hospital are contracted to work 37.5hours a week (ie 3 full shifts), on top of that, they can choose to work bank shifts to top up their income
i dunno. an average GP receives £136 per patient they cover. is that a lot? i'm pretty sure your (as in, your in general, not you) pet insurance costs more than that.
some GPs do work weekends and nights. it's called GP out-of-hours (or whatever it's called in your area).
and this is what happens when a weekend service is rolled out -
http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/health/news/article4467897.ece - not many people attend
Surely a large part of being in the medical profession is the genuine desire to help people? If her point is that she and her colleagues are only doing it because they drew up a cost/benefit analysis in sixth-form and it seemed like a sweet deal at the time, I'd say we have bigger issues attracting the right people than nit-picking over working hours.
well so having a vocation and profession means paying doctors peanuts? so should ocuk sell stuff at cost because they are a group of overclocking enthusiasts?
i know what you're going to say: ocuk are a business - its different. but not really.
it's like walking into their shop and saying: you have to sell me stuff cheap because you like overclocking and so do i. - doesn't quite make sense
and besides, its not about the working hours. it's the so-called health secretary calling the doctors unprofessional and blocking change to a "7 day NHS". most doctors already do this and most doctors support this.
don't forget having senior cover means you need the infrastructure to support this. ie: having porters to move the patients, having radiographers to operate the scanners, radiologists to interpret these scans, interventions by their respective departments, phyisotherapists, occupational therapists, social workers, discharge nurses, pharmacists, social care that works weekends to facilitate these discharges.
it's like saying: i want a bigger army. so i'll get more generals, but no more soldiers. doesn't quite make sense right?
the question is - if you want more cover, how is the state going to fund it?
a) forcing your current workforce to work longer, more unsociable hours? oh right, so much for patient safety then, eh? and what about staff being, gasp, actually human and having a family/social life outside work?
b) have a pay cut to try and hire more? but then who in their right mind would join an industry which is high intensity, notorious for burn out, has a high propensity for mistakes due to overwork and can land one in jail/criminal record/struck off?
c) privatise
d) a+b +/- c = gg