They've got a lot of kit but they're not very good a winning so I think the people would win presuming the tyrant doesn't use nukes on their own country.
Hypothetical wet dream m8.

They've got a lot of kit but they're not very good a winning so I think the people would win presuming the tyrant doesn't use nukes on their own country.
Hypothetical wet dream m8.![]()
Well, if they didn't protect their freedoms, they would be fined for taking their kids on holiday during school term, fined for riding bikes on a path, fined for dropping degradable litter, fined for not registering a birth, fined for not paying a TV license, bailiffs would take their possessions without a court order....I suppose you can see where this is heading.One of the primary reasons that the US is so protective around firearms is that they feel they need it to protect "freedom"
If an armed officer in the UK had been faced with that, they'd have shot him too, so it's not a UK v US thing.
If an armed officer in the UK had been faced with that, they'd have shot him too, so it's not a UK v US thing.
The 'UK v US thing' is a valid comparison to make as the two nations encompass both ends of the spectrum when it comes to guns.
We don't deploy armed police generally to people armed with knives. In the US though, every time you encounter the police, whether you're armed and threatening or simply have faulty break lights on your car, you are met with an armed officer. So the potential for someone to get shot and killed is exponentially higher in the US than in the UK.
You forget police in NI are armed and yet don't go shooting people at random.
There are many cases in the US were they could have used a taser instead of a gun.
No I didn't forget, I was simply addressing the majority of cases. NI is an exception.
Yes Americans can and do use tasers and sometimes even these result in deaths, however in the majority of cases US police are trained to use lethal force at the slightest threat they encounter and they do this with guns.
Very interesting read in the Washington Post on how US Police culture and training is over-emphasising the likelyhood of danger to officers, and the promotion of maximum force as an early intervention;
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/...f-south-carolina-state-trooper-sean-groubert/
The article loosely hangs off the shooting we've discussed here in the past of the officer instructing a man at a "gas station" to show his licence, and then shoots him when the guy reaching into his car to actually get the licence.
Yes they are. I read an interesting article about it, which I referenced earlier in the thread (worth a look if you haven't already);