False. If it were infinite there then the depth gauge would read ∞ft, not 90ft!
people were talking about infinite economic growth
At first we must be sure of growth not contraction. It is possible for a country to come to an end in defined terms, its government even its people.
China and Japan have a declining population and especially this matters where their working population is contracting, this would suggest until reversed that country is not undergoing growth but contraction. If the money supply is being expanded at the same time it's going to lead to much lower value I think.
Growth is not infinite but we dont fix the estimate to just one life span, its just a question of what rates are attached to the use of that money I think and how much growth average we expect. Those who lend value to a currency expect a return of some kind, its not an infinite reserve and this value can be placed elsewhere
Money is just used to describe value and exchange in trade between people even while the currency extends beyond strict borders, it has to serve a purpose to those using it. If UK money goes from a population of 60 million to being used by billions, its not infinite but its a very large potential. Dollars are currently used by every country of the world so Im expecting it will reverse and become very much finite
1. Money used to be backed by gold, but clearly that was not a good long term bet, so now it's backed by a complicit understanding that the governments/banks will guarantee/support the currencies. Kind of a system of belief if you will.
We used to trust the chemical properties of gold would be valued tomorrow similar to what they were previously. That seems a fair bet, gold is inert (I dont want it or value it really personally but I cant deny it doesnt change at all even over years). Now we trust politics will lend value and not vary considerably but history shows the path of one country especially does alter drastically so I expect its currency not to be as stable as gold.
Most people want to earn their money, store its value for when they are not working or not able even so of the two I'd expect gold to pass value over time far better then politics holds in its modern federal reserve notes or our own Bank of england notes, neither holds assets beyond the licence and access to this political control