The EU Migrant Crisis

Status
Not open for further replies.
sityeuropa said:
A couple of generations may do it internally.
Click to expand...

Well, that is how babies made, yes.

You can't get pregnant from a facial.

But beyond being facetious, even if every Muslim couple had 3 children, it would take 11 generations.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Caged said:
So because some Muslim men have raped people before, you feel justified in repeating the 77% figure even though you have no idea where it came from and if it's anywhere close to being accurate?
Click to expand...

does it matter if you have been offered to live in this country you should live by the rules if you commit a crime then you should be exported back to your home land, no if no buts.
 
I'm guessing foxeye as stuck me on block too for posting facts and actually agreeing with him on some point.

Some people just don't like being challenged on nonsense
 
matdom said:
does it matter if you have been offered to live in this country you should live by the rules if you commit a crime then you should be exported back to your home land, no if no buts.
Click to expand...

I don't think anyone has suggested any different? In fact I suggested exactly that's how it should be.
 
Boycey0211 said:
I'm guessing foxeye as stuck me on block too for posting facts and actually agreeing with him on some point.

Some people just don't like being challenged on nonsense
Click to expand...

Interesting fact: I have 0 people on ignore. I think. I don't remember ever using it :p Why would I block you?
 
Why didnt the migrants (from Syria) go to Saudi Arabia, UAE, Israel, Jordan, Qatar ?
Most of these countries have much more common ground culture wise than European countries (hence easier to settle in) so why are they making a beeline for Europe?


I guess the simple answer is those countries said no?
 
Surfer said:
Why didnt the migrants (from Syria) go to Saudi Arabia, UAE, Israel, Jordan, Qatar ?
Most of these countries have much more common ground culture wise than European countries (hence easier to settle in) so why are they making a beeline for Europe?


I guess the simple answer is those countries said no?
Click to expand...

Jordan have taken 1.5 mill refugees.

Israel - They have stuff in common culture wise with syria? A state set up with the sole purpose of resettling JEWISH people. Really?

The remainder are **** holes, I wouldn't want to go there either.

Use your brain before you post old chap.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Surfer said:
Why didnt the migrants (from Syria) go to Saudi Arabia, UAE, Israel, Jordan, Qatar ?
Most of these countries have much more common ground culture wise than European countries (hence easier to settle in) so why are they making a beeline for Europe?


I guess the simple answer is those countries said no?
Click to expand...

That is half the problem - there is a lot of tribal, religious, etc. fracturing even between Muslims in that part of the world and why this has potential to blow up into something a lot of EU countries simply aren't prepared for if they open the floodgates (aside from the pure numbers aspect).

Aside from traditional aspects some of those countries can also see which way the wind is blowing much better than Merkel and the like seem to - unless deep down they are really playing this with the agenda of softening up the "bleeding hearts", etc. for military action in Syria, etc. down the line when they can turn around and say well do you want this or children dying on the beaches.
 
amigafan2003 said:
Jordan have taken 1.5 mill refugees.

Israel - lol, really? Are you really asking why Israel aren't taking (mainly) Muslim refugees?

The remainder are **** holes, I wouldn't want to go there either.
Click to expand...

Same as UEA, Quatar etc, if you're rich when you get there life is good, if you're poor then being a muslim doesn't help you in the slightest, they have some of the worst living conditions for migrants I have ever seen
 
Caged said:
I can see where the views are coming from and it is no doubt a concern that a lot of people hold. I don't buy too much into the argument that if we weren't doing anything for the refugees/migrants that we'd suddenly start treating our own like something higher than scum, though. The Daily Mash article linked earlier pretty much nailed that one, as they tend to do. You only have to look at the response threads about welfare manage to rack up in here to see that there exists a 'FYGM' attitude in a lot of people.
Click to expand...

I don't disagree, we haven't done anything of significance for our own if we're honest about it. We should though and everytime there's a call to arms to send aid around the world it's extremely hypocritical of those that demand something be done. An example this morning that really gripped me was a jock on 5 Live saying he would welcome refugees like the Germans have into his community and cheer them arriving, yet when asked by a former minister if he would house any himself be refused to answer. My point being there's apparently 5000 people who have signed up to an online petition (from the 30 seconds I could stomach of the one show tonight) to volunteer to home refugees yet I would bet my bottom dollar that only a handful of the 5000 would home a homeless person from the UK. My biggest issue with this whole situation is the utter ignorance and outright hypocrisy coming to light from the British public. I'm genuinely shocked at the basic lack of understanding of long term issues that can and will occur. I don't know where this short termism derives from other than the result of the information era.

This situation isn't going to end well for anyone.
 
sityeuropa said:
If Muslims got 50% of the population in the UK. Can anyone say that there wouldn't be changes to law? You can't.

Multiculturalism of different religions only works when it's a minority. As soon as them numbers even up there will be trouble ahead.
Click to expand...

It wouldn't even have to be >50% to tip things over the edge.


15-20% and things will get violent. There won't be enough police resources to respond to the crimes committed. Muslims will engulf the population and people in the UK will be too lazy or preoccupied to do anything about it.

When the cities that wield the power are muslim dominant it doesn't matter how many non-muslims live in Tunbridge Wells or the nice spa towns of the country.

The vocal minority can be very powerful. For example consider tv adverts that have been banned from just a few complaints.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom