Trident doesn't need to be replaced because it won't stop working.
He will be gone in 6 months.
if Russia did invade in theory, we wouldn't use nuclear weapons then either.
If we get nuked in the UK then I can pretty much 100% guarantee it would be by a factor able to hide it's origin (proxy) or detonated domestically after being smuggled in. ).
You're an idiot if you think the guy is a Marxist. There's a long distance between what Corbyn and McDonnell are talking about, and Marxism. Neither seem particularly interested in Marxism or Communism these days - they are economic and social systems that have been demonstrated to fail.
That obvious?
He won't
Welcome to a new era of politics..
Old, 1980s politics...![]()
Better than the 1950's policies parts of the Tories would have us under![]()
Like nurturing economic boom and leading the country to ever-increasing national prosperity. Like when Britain had "never had it so good".![]()
We could have aircraft launched nukes as an alternative, I know they're not as good as a submarine but it'd be awesome to have a modern replacement for the Vulcan.
He added that 187 countries "don't feel the need to have a nuclear weapon to protect their security", and asked "why should those five need it themselves?"
Wow...
From the guy who bleats on about straight talking... you offer those 187 countries a paid for, NATO, etc. permitted, nuclear weapons program and the larger number wouldn't be turning you down.
I'm only in favour of Trident if we are going to use it and actually get our moneys worth.