Why Are Westerners Having Less Kids ?

Dicehunter said:
In 1-2 decades based on current stats
Click to expand...

And in that phrase is the basis of that racist argument. The problem with the stat is though, that the birthrate doesn't stay the same for families of immigrants. There's endless evidence that first generation immigrants have birthrates similar to the country they came from, but within a couple of generations (and usually one) the birthrate becomes the same as the local rate. It's not even a new argument: people have been bleating about this non-stop for forty years or more. Variations of it go back hundreds of years. There's text from ancient Assyria where people are complaining about being out-bred by an influx of foreigners.


In answer to the original questions, yes, as people get richer they have less children. And yes, we should be grateful - the world needs fewer people, not more. The demographic time-bomb needs to addressed though.
 
jas72 said:
Eh?

Much like Native Americans and Aborigines let's see what they thought of the influx of western civilisation?

How can the population be in a minority in Sweden after 20 years?

Migration figures also take into account people studying and on temporary work permits or even taking citizenship because they aren't from the EU but without intent to live long term in Sweden.

Even now they only make up 14% of the population and are growing at 100 000 per year (all types included)

The assumptions made that in 20 years all foreign nationals will have 4-5 kids and Swedes 0-1 is wild to say the least.
Click to expand...

They breed like bunnies, so it is entirely possible.

I was going to say more but, the ban hammers are strong on this subject and many others I might add. :mad:
 
Meridian said:
And in that phrase is the basis of that racist argument. The problem with the stat is though, that the birthrate doesn't stay the same for families of immigrants. There's endless evidence that first generation immigrants have birthrates similar to the country they came from, but within a couple of generations (and usually one) the birthrate becomes the same as the local rate. It's not even a new argument: people have been bleating about this non-stop for forty years or more. Variations of it go back hundreds of years. There's text from ancient Assyria where people are complaining about being out-bred by an influx of foreigners.


In answer to the original questions, yes, as people get richer they have less children. And yes, we should be grateful - the world needs fewer people, not more. The demographic time-bomb needs to addressed though.
Click to expand...

Racist argument ? At no point was any of this racist, It was a simple question.

Nowadays thanks to people like you, People can no longer ask harmless question like the one I posted without the question needlessly being called racist, It's utterly pathetic.
 
Dicehunter said:
Racist argument ? At no point was any of this racist, It was a simple question.

Nowadays thanks to people like you, People can no longer ask harmless question like the one I posted without the question needlessly being called racist, It's utterly pathetic.
Click to expand...

I would not bother, you cannot say F all these days without some collage educated indoctrinated multiculturalist grinding your balls. :mad:

Freedom of speech is dead, period! :(
 
Nobody has mentioned the that the system that the majority adhere to is imo the root cause of this and many other problems that we face.
Legality is the issue here, it has no benefit to man or woman..
 
itchy said:
I would not bother, you cannot say F all these days without some collage educated indoctrinated multiculturalist grinding your balls. :mad:

Freedom of speech is dead, period! :(
Click to expand...

Have to agree on that, I said this the other day and got called a racist bigot among other things -

"Question, Why do places/countries with mostly white people need more asian/african diversity but places/countries with mainly all asian/african peoples do not need any white diversity ?"

Pretty fair question I thought and for that I got called worse than hitler :rolleyes:
 
Dicehunter said:
Have to agree on that, I said this the other day and got called a racist bigot among other things -

"Question, Why do places/countries with mostly white people need more asian/african diversity but places/countries with mainly all asian/african peoples do not need any white diversity ?"

Pretty fair question I thought and for that I got called worse than hitler :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

qmCv1wb.jpg
:D

It is getting ridiculous to the point of ludicrous absurdity. :mad:

I don't get why people will not listen or understand other peoples views.
 
Last edited:
Dicehunter said:
Have to agree on that, I said this the other day and got called a racist bigot among other things -

"Question, Why do places/countries with mostly white people need more asian/african diversity but places/countries with mainly all asian/african peoples do not need any white diversity ?"

Pretty fair question I thought and for that I got called worse than hitler :rolleyes:
Click to expand...

You make no sense. Try this: "Places with people need tolerance. Otherwise we risk being bigots."

Saves you the quite unnecessary complexity of colour/ethnicity and countries. Simple when you think about it.
 
Dave M said:
You make no sense. Try this: "Places with people need tolerance. Otherwise we risk being bigots."

Saves you the quite unnecessary complexity of colour/ethnicity and countries. Simple when you think about it.
Click to expand...

It does make sense, Just read it.

The word bigot really needs to die.

Can't be patriotic anymore because then you're a bigot.

Can't find only your own people attractive anymore of you're a racist bigot worse than hitler.

Can't want to live around your own people anymore or your a racist bigot.

The regressive left have done a fantastic job of forcing multiculturalism and creating a smear campaign for anyone who doesn't want it, Utter insanity not to mention completely 1 sided.
 
Dicehunter said:
It does make sense, Just read it.

The word bigot really needs to die.

Can't be patriotic anymore because then you're a bigot.

Can't find only your own people attractive anymore of you're a racist bigot worse than hitler.

Can't want to live around your own people anymore or your a racist bigot.

The regressive left have done a fantastic job of forcing multiculturalism and creating a smear campaign for anyone who doesn't want it, Utter insanity not to mention completely 1 sided.
Click to expand...

Shhhhhhh you will only cause trouble its not allowed around these parts.
Your opinion does not count, you are a minority now. :(

All hail multiculturalism, I say again all hail multiculturalism. :mad:

We have less children because we are intelligent enough to understand our responsibilities of child care and up bringing.
 
Caseh said:
I do want kids at some point, I've just not found myself in a relationship with someone yet that I feel would be the right person to settle down and start a family with - I am only 27 though, so I'd guess there is a fair bit of time left - But I have also thought quite often that I would like to have 1 child of my own and to then adopt 1.
Click to expand...

Lol! These people crack me up. You talk like a 45 - 48 year old as if there is a sell by date about to expire. You're 27!
 
FishFluff said:
I'm not having kids as the world is already overpopulated and I just don't really like kids. Anyone having more than 2 children needs to have a word with themselves though.
Click to expand...

Anyone coming out with a statement like "I just don't really like kids" needs to have a word with themselves.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom