Charlie Hebdo Anniversary Edition
- Thread starter philip2009
- Start date
You can't call truth seekers sheep.
The sheeple, are the ones who believe every piece of crap they hear from the MSM, then rely on our governments to do some thing about it and protect them.
Truth seekers stand together, and are demonized (or labeled) as conspiracy theorists, NOT sheep.
Nice strawman. You can check the quotes from the Bible if you have doubts about the site.
You can, very easily in fact. Just look at echo chambers like above top secret and see them flocking to any old rubbish in a poor you tube video with a scary sound track.
The problem is that people who believe most conspiracy theory they come across always show an inability to exhibit critical thought and the ability to rationally view evidence and sources.
Sure keep an open mind, but be critical of the evidence (or lack of as the case may be) whether it's the official line or alternative.
Man of Honour
- Joined
- 29 Mar 2003
- Posts
- 57,755
- Location
- Stoke on Trent
Planes do this 24/7 - it's called landing except this one wasn't going to stop.
You truly are special.
There's a reason mainstream media is mainstream. It's because it reflects reality. CT nutters reflect ignorance and a refusal to accept reality.
Except when the land they put their wheels down and flaps out to reduce ground turbulance. Pilots say its impossible too but I guess you won't believe them. Also they got rid of the cctv, if that doesn't tell you anything and all the other scientifically gathered evidence then well I guess msm has done a wonderful job in dumbing people down.
It does matter since the entire point that video was trying to make is "look there was no plane". If it turns out that in fact a plane can travel that sort of distance in one second then the entire video has no purpose to the conspiracy nut community. But I guess critical evaluation of stuff like this is beyond you - you have a predefined idea of what happened and will happily interpret evidence in a way that suits that idea, and ignore anything that doesn't fit the narrative. You know, like you claim sane people do.
Easily conflicted with the few quotes I posted up, hence religion is always about interpretation, ergo the problems we have with Islam at the moment
Anyway, it's OT to the thread and being non religious I don't give a **** anyway
There's a reason mainstream media is mainstream. It's because it reflects reality. CT nutters reflect ignorance and a refusal to accept reality.
CT watch mainstream media too, except they read into it more and don't take the word entirely as gospel. I think AE911, Pilots for 9/11 truth and Scholars for 9/11 truth will tell you all you need to know. Remember it took the Jersey Girls 441 days to convince the white house to investigate the attack.
Mainstream media doesn't reflect reality on the basis that it's main stream. That's some serious circular logic you've got going on there, and has to be up there with one of the most braindead things I've seen you post.
It's no different to saying "it's true because they say it's a fact".
Oh right, it's a club of special people. That makes sense explains a lot. As I've said many many times it's not black and white, blind faith is blind faith no matter which side you're on. Sometimes you have to accept things and when the body of evidence is VASTLY in one place sensible people will conclude their opinion and not blindly seek content to be right. Truth seekers, don't make me laugh.
You really should educate yourself on religion before you attempt to educate people on it.
Islam, Christianity, and Judaism all have the same "God" at the centre. The differences are in areas that they disagree on.
Muslims and Jews don't believe Jesus was the son of God, for example. That doesn't mean that they don't believe in the same god, it just means that the larger picture is the same but the details are different.
They are called the Abrahamic religions, it's all the same stuff from different points of view.
Why do you assume that mainstream media is the source of knowledge for people who don't support the crazy hypothesise brigade? Bit silly, no?
The problem is that some people are so sensitive to this sort of thing that you can't even say you think the official story of x incident seems suspect and incomplete without them foaming at the mouth, going on about how you're a "CT nut" and then trying to use that as a basis to discredit everything you ever say.
What? What assumptions am I making exactly?
Yes you can, I do it all the time. But when I see crazy that I 100% know to be crazy, such as no planes theories I call crazy. if people who often were still at school seek to tell me they know better about something because they've looked at some websites and read some books I laugh too. I have friends and colleagues who I spoke to on the day, in the cities when 9/11 happened. I worked for a company who had an office in the twin towers and I know the conversations that day. When some faceless spod then (no inference) tries to tell me they were wrong you're surprised I take issue with such stupidity, surely?
Last edited:
That mainstream media doesn't represent reality which is a BIG sweeping statement, let's start there. I'm well aware it should be purely once source of comment, but let's not say nothing in the mainstream media is real.