• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Asrock removes Sky OC in mb's

Soldato
Joined
10 Oct 2012
Posts
4,437
Location
Denmark
Was pretty close on dropping some cash on a skylake 6500 cpu and mobo but now not so much. Ill stay on my gimped haswell as im not paying for another K sku anytime soon
 
Soldato
Joined
25 Jun 2011
Posts
5,468
Location
Yorkshire and proud of it!
Bit late now Intel, we'll just use the BIOS versions that support it.

Still, not an auspicious sign. Either ASROCK found that they couldn't really deliver on this after all, or Intel told them to stop or Intel would go all Intel on them. And I think we all know which of those two it is.

Overclocking was about taking something beyond its regular specs. Now it's about buying the privilege to be able take it up from the below capacity to where the manufacturer could have just set it to in the first place. A little like Coke deciding they want to sell 2.5 litre bottles of coke and advertising it as a 2 litre bottle with 0.5 litres free. Or at least it becomes so with behaviour like this.

Though admittedly, this ship has long since sailed and this incident is just them plugging a loophole someone found.
 
Soldato
Joined
29 Feb 2004
Posts
3,620
what happens to ppl with the OcUK bundles, would OcUK have to take returns on them if the clocks was removed by bios update

Nah, the pre-overclocked stuff always has something along the lines of "overclock only supported with bios recieved".

The non-k bundles have

"Updating the CPU microcode via BIOS update or software may effect the ovreclocking of this bundle. So once installed CPU microcode on provided BIOS should remain the same. We can only guarantee the overclock on the the CPU microcode which is provided when you receive the bundle."
 
Caporegime
Joined
26 Dec 2003
Posts
25,666
If Intel wanted people overclocking all of the Skylake processors then they would have unlocked them all, it's understandable that motherboard manufacturers will have got a telling off as the hack will be costing Intel money.
 
Permabanned
Joined
6 Feb 2010
Posts
6,138
Location
Barnsley
If Intel wanted people overclocking all of the Skylake processors then they would have unlocked them all, it's understandable that motherboard manufacturers will have got a telling off as the hack will be costing Intel money.

its nice to see all the K chaps went back up in price to the pre none k clocking stage instantly.
its not about what intel want... the motherboard makes should be open to do what they want with there own products. intel made the chip the way it is.

there will continue to be a flow of hacked bios's so i dont see it changing anything
i have 49 bios's on my cloud account
 
Last edited:
Soldato
Joined
28 May 2007
Posts
18,432
If Intel wanted people overclocking all of the Skylake processors then they would have unlocked them all, it's understandable that motherboard manufacturers will have got a telling off as the hack will be costing Intel money.

Intel make a killing either way.

Motherboard sales are in the toilet. The reason for that is Intel's strategy of charging a fortune for chips and offering nothing over 5 years.
 
Caporegime
Joined
26 Dec 2003
Posts
25,666
its nice to see all the K chaps went back up in price to the pre none k clocking stage instantly.

Blame AMD for not offering any competition, they could have released Steamroller/Excavator based processors on AM3+ (or even developed a better architecture based on K10 by now) but didn't, so Intel effectively have a monopoly.

its not about what intel want... the motherboard makes should be open to do what they want with there own products. intel made the chip the way it is.

They buy the most important parts of their 'own products' (chipsets) from Intel and presumably under license, so they simply can't go around negatively impacting Intel's sales.
 
Caporegime
Joined
26 Dec 2003
Posts
25,666
Intel make a killing either way.

Motherboard sales are in the toilet. The reason for that is Intel's strategy of charging a fortune for chips and offering nothing over 5 years.

...and what of AMD's strategy? at least Intel are still releasing new products for them to make money off.

At the end of the day motherboard manufacturers aren't forced to make motherboards for Intel, if they are still releasing new motherboards then they obviously feel there is still money to be made. Attempting to increase their own sales by biting the only hand that is currently feeding them is simply asking for trouble.
 
Permabanned
Joined
6 Feb 2010
Posts
6,138
Location
Barnsley
They buy the most important parts of their 'own products' (chipsets) from Intel and presumably under license, so they simply can't go around negatively impacting Intel's sales.

what would intel do tel,l all the makers you can use are product lol

Blame AMD for not offering any competition, they could have released Steamroller/Excavator based processors on AM3+ (or even developed a better architecture based on K10 by now) but didn't, so Intel effectively have a monopoly.

why is everything down to amd all the time, overclocks had stock when the prices changed... its down to demand and shops
 
Back
Top Bottom