The Gender Pay Gap Is Dead

Some facts of how many/influential "third wave" feminists there are, would either back up that claim or destroy it. I don't see any facts just opinion.
 
Some facts of how many/influential "third wave" feminists there are, would either back up that claim or destroy it. I don't see any facts just opinion.

I'm not sure there is much data on how many feminists there are and frankly whether you define yourself as a feminist depends on the definition.... I mean can you provide any numbers of second wave feminists vs third wave feminists?

however I can provide some examples for you:

third wave feminist who believes she can't be racist to white men - by popular vote she was the diversity officer at a London University:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukn...ent-on-Twitter-saying-kill-all-white-men.html

Student diversity officer 'posted racist comment on Twitter' saying 'kill all white men'
Bahar Mustafa, 28, from Goldsmiths University, has been ordered to appear before magistrates

another union official - by popular vote she is the women's officer at Cardiff university - wanted to ban second wave feminist Germaine Greer

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-south-east-wales-34626450
Ms Greer is due to speak in a lecture called Women & Power: The Lessons of the 20th Century.
Students' union women's officer Rachel Melhuish said Ms Greer's views towards transgender women are "misogynistic".
 
Last edited:
some examples for you:

third wave feminist who believes she can't be racist to white men - by popular vote she was the diversity officer at a London University:

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/ukn...ent-on-Twitter-saying-kill-all-white-men.html



another union official - by popular vote she is the women's officer at Cardiff university - wanted to ban second wave feminist Germaine Greer

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-wales-south-east-wales-34626450

Keep posting some crazies at lesser universities, you'll need a lot of them and they need to be influential before I'll agree that they now own the term feminist.
 
can you provide any data?

well I hear that pankhurst et al did a bit for equality, not sure if they went to cardiff uni and had 15minutes of fame for being a plum or not though.

I'd say the definition on the word feminism is

"the advocacy of women's rights on the ground of the equality of the sexes."


If you want to change the meaning of the word I'd suggest the burden of proof lies with you...
 
I'm not changing the meaning of the word, I'm pointing out that a lot of modern 'feminists' go far beyond that

also I'm in favour of equality in general not just equality advocated for from the POV of arguing for women's rights
 
I'm not changing the meaning of the word, I'm pointing out that a lot of modern 'feminists' go far beyond that

also I'm in favour of equality in general not just equality advocated for from the POV of arguing for women's rights

Well you're not pointing out a lot you are pointing out 2 crazies in a country of millions of people who would likely read that definition of feminism and say it sounds fair enough to me, you included you feminist. :)
 
but lots of people simply in favour of equality wouldn't define themselves as feminists... tis like saying therefore most people are a meninist when MRA types who typically call themselves meninists are in fact rather misogynistic
 
but by the definition of the word advocating equal rights is feminist and in my opinion that's no terrible thing. Still there should be a word for us equality loving guys too :)
 
there is a distinction in that feminists advocate for equality from the perspective of advocating for areas where they see women losing out

I'm in favour of equality in a much broader sense
 
there is a distinction in that feminists advocate for equality from the perspective of advocating for areas where they see women losing out

I'm in favour of equality in a much broader sense

There is nothing wrong with that IMHO, I'd stand with the fathers for justice campaign as quickly as I'd stand up for womens rights. While we're at it equality doesn't always mean the same treatment, just equal chances. Women and Men have differences that should be addressed through different approaches to give equal chances.
 
I'm in favour of equality in a much broader sense

Me too, I'd love to see Kovalev against Ronda Rousey :cool:

but by the definition of the word advocating equal rights is feminist and in my opinion that's no terrible thing. Still there should be a word for us equality loving guys too :)

There is a word for guys advocating feminasty 'equal' rights - beta :)
 
Last edited:
Feminism, by inception, is about positive discrimination to bring women on par with men. The argument now is that we've reached that parity and dividing the genders further over what often amount to non-issues and a lack of personal responsibility is both toxic and destructive to society at large.

Newsflash: Man believes that gender inequality has been solved. :p

Going back to an earlier part of the thread, Shared Parental Leave was brought in less than 12 months ago. Do you think that was really the last piece of the puzzle?

I don't think we'll have true gender equality until the suicide rates even out. It's a bit morbid but that's when we'll know that men are no longer seen as the main bread-winners and feel comfortable talking about their feelings.
 
A woman who works at my place on the same pay grade has just had the last year off to have a baby. Now as far as I'm concerned she's earn't more than me, per hour worked, as for 6 months of that she was getting paid the same as me with zero input.

We should mirror the Scandanavian system (not sure if it is all countries or just Norway) where both parents get the option of 1 year off.

But in Britain we need equality (unless it is an inequality of favour of women herp derp)
 
Newsflash: Man believes that gender inequality has been solved. :p

Parity doesn't mean we're done. Stop being flippant. My argument is that third-wave feminism is pushing for positive discrimination that isn't needed. In fact, the pendulum is now swinging the other way but you're not allowed to mention male problems because third wavers shout you down as they incorrectly assume that you're invalidating their needs or worse, denying equality.

Equality now is not going to be reached by pushing female problems alone or by prioritising them above male problems. Equality means addressing all problems for all people, equally. Explain to me how prioritising female issues above male helps achieve that?

True equalitarians need to distance themselves from the poison that third wave feminism has become so we can carry on with the good work.

Going back to an earlier part of the thread, Shared Parental Leave was brought in less than 12 months ago. Do you think that was really the last piece of the puzzle?

Of course not.

I don't think we'll have true gender equality until the suicide rates even out. It's a bit morbid but that's when we'll know that men are no longer seen as the main bread-winners and feel comfortable talking about their feelings.

If you read above, you'll see I'm very concerned about mental health issues.

It's a bit difficult for men to be comfortable talking about their feelings when SJWs shout them down, bully them or otherwise invalidate them. 'Male tears' ring any bells?
 
Back
Top Bottom