Soldato
- Joined
- 11 Mar 2013
- Posts
- 5,535
Division looks awful on PC. I'm not wasting my money on that steaming pile.
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Division looks awful on PC. I'm not wasting my money on that steaming pile.
SS is unlocked and goes to a max of 2x, which results in around 20 fps for me at 1440P.
That makes me think such settings aren't worth having in the games.
Can Async reduce msaa cost, if it does it'll perhaps answer the Async speculation.
I think it's just to enable Compute to run concurrently with Graphics...
You running Ultra with a decent res?
Or you a low-ender?![]()
Even with a Titan X is awful. Ubi dumbed down another title that could've been great, but instead went console![]()
I know that bit.
What I don't know is what type of IQ compute 'effect' can be ran concurrently that's going to reduce 'cost' on the superior solution, is msaa one of them?
Going off of SD's max IQ hit, I think used compute giving AMD advantage with the 79 series>6 series, until Titan/78's compute capabilities restored performance parity.
Wondering if something like that is going to happen again if NV do have an AS problem.![]()
The Division is great to look at and play bud.
What fps you getting?
Yeah, and beating it at 4k, even the 390X is doing well at 4k, matching the Ti.
Still, its only a Beta, id expect all change on final release.
Yeah but regardless of who is the winner its looking good for us when the dx12 version is out if 1 card can average 50fps even on dx11.
That moment when it comes out of beta and the results are no different. Async compute letting the AMD cards stretch their legs.