The Division. Are we interested?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Made it to Level 8 last night, had a great time doing the Wild Child bounty side mission.

I'm going to send Uplay friend requests out, IanofIvarstead is my Uplay name. Would like to give the co-op and DZ a go soon.

Cheers,
 
BaDBoY_uK said:
Okay... okay... I take it all back. What a ******* game! Once I realised it was an MMO, I was hooked

Graphics are also epic
Click to expand...

Its a bit of a stretch to call it an MMO imo, its not really any more an MMO than Diablo, Path of Exile or Battlefield are. I'd categorise it as an Online Multiplayer game, rather than a Massively Multiplayer Online game. As far as I know, the DZ instances are 24 players max, which certainly isnt massive, less than BF which certainly isnt an MMO.
 
Went DZ last night and the server was empty. Shame really as I was going to try going rouge for the first time. The other day I was being baited by a group calling my mum a whore.
 
68% is a bad score, but I always find them to be a bit 'up their own', if you know what I mean.

I just watched the NYC vs The Division NYC video, it's amazing how close they were to replicating NYC in real life. But, I wonder why The Empire State Building in The Division looks so much different to its real life counterpart when everything else is spot on?
 
That review is a joke, I don't understand how he has a job doing that sort of thing, he's clearly awful at it.

The division isn't perfect and some people will hate it but a reviewer needs to go into a lot more depth and i got the impression he's just against these types of games. I bet he is one of those idiots that keep giving cod 99.9%
 
Born_2_Kill_83 said:
PC Gamer review 68%


http://www.pcgamer.com/tom-clancys-...tm_source=twitter&utm_campaign=buffer-pcgamer

Bit off the mark with that imo.
Click to expand...

68% is harsh but I agree with all the criticisms to be honest. Once you get down to it and past the visuals it's highly repetitive with no real story or characters and average gun play. It's fun though but I get the feeling that there is no end game and just grind.

Even the bosses arent really an event, just grind them down moving from cover to cover.

On the plus side it does look very pretty and the engine is stable and runs well. It does give you that "just one more mission" feeling too.
 
Last edited:
Minstadave said:
68% is harsh but I agree with all the criticisms to be honest. Once you get down to it and past the visuals it's highly repetitive with no real story or characters and average gun play. It's fun though but I get the feeling that there is no end game and just grind.

Even the bosses arent really an event, just grind them down moving from cover to cover.

On the plus side it does look very pretty and the engine is stable and runs well. It does give you that "just one more mission" feeling too.
Click to expand...

I think the main end game will end up being the raids they have coming.
 
played last night and got my first bug.

CAnt remember mission name, level 20+ and you start in the street and go down some subway stairs. Anyway, everytime I went down there was no floor so i just floated to the bottom of the world and respawned in the nearest safehouse.

Quite annoying, re launching the game fixed it though.

Also, how do you take screenshots in game?! or does smashing the prnt screen save them to some super secret folder somewhere and just not tell you?
 
llamadal said:
That review is a joke, I don't understand how he has a job doing that sort of thing, he's clearly awful at it.

The division isn't perfect and some people will hate it but a reviewer needs to go into a lot more depth and i got the impression he's just against these types of games. I bet he is one of those idiots that keep giving cod 99.9%
Click to expand...

Cant find him reviewing COD but he did give The Aquatic Adventure of the last human a solid 90% lolz :D

http://www.pcgamer.com/the-aquatic-adventure-of-the-last-human-review/
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom