Soldato
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 11,701
- Location
- Cheshire
Currently going though the selling/buying process and come to a bit of a speed bump....
Our vendors have come back and said they've dont have the installation/testing certificates for the complete electrical rewire and gas fire install that they've had done (2011 onwards). Now I dont yet know if its just a solicitor mixup, but it would also appear they're saying they cant remember who they used for the work, so cant obtain copy certificates and I've checked the relevant bodies (LA, NICEIC, Gas Safe, Corgi) and they dont have any of the work registered either.
Vendors solicitor have suggested they provide an indemnity policy (they'll pay for it), but i dont feel this is adequate and want them to provide test certificates (or equivalent reports) even if that means they need to pay to get the installs tested again, seeing as they have no proof either install was previously tested as per legal requirements.
Question is - Am I being unreasonable in expecting them to fund this additional testing? In my opinion they've been negligent by a) Not retaining the original install/test certificates, b) Not chasing up their tradesmen to ensure the installs were registered as per legal requirements.
Our vendors have come back and said they've dont have the installation/testing certificates for the complete electrical rewire and gas fire install that they've had done (2011 onwards). Now I dont yet know if its just a solicitor mixup, but it would also appear they're saying they cant remember who they used for the work, so cant obtain copy certificates and I've checked the relevant bodies (LA, NICEIC, Gas Safe, Corgi) and they dont have any of the work registered either.
Vendors solicitor have suggested they provide an indemnity policy (they'll pay for it), but i dont feel this is adequate and want them to provide test certificates (or equivalent reports) even if that means they need to pay to get the installs tested again, seeing as they have no proof either install was previously tested as per legal requirements.
Question is - Am I being unreasonable in expecting them to fund this additional testing? In my opinion they've been negligent by a) Not retaining the original install/test certificates, b) Not chasing up their tradesmen to ensure the installs were registered as per legal requirements.
Last edited: