No, this is what quite a few people, particularly Brexiteers, actually think.
Unbelievable
They are obliged to under the agreement they have. One they can end. We are obliged to under the agreement we have. One we can end. The result in the sense of sovereignty is the same (or less get as non members as they don't get the proportional input members get).
Whichever way you look at it, Norway has a lot more "sovereignty" than we do. The principle of the "Supremacy of EU Law" applies to more areas if you're in the EU as opposed to in the EEA/EFTA. Norway may choose to adhere to more areas of EU law at its own option, but we have lost sovereignty in those areas and should get it back.
The above, combined with the EU being in disarray, means the vast majority people of Iceland, Norway and Switzerland don't want to join the EU. They don't think they've got a bad deal.
And being outside when it comes to eg. fish means that there are tariffs on goods like smoked salmon from Norway, iirc (12% on that, then eg. 400% on cheese from France to Norway). So it's like how we could leave completely and have control... but at a cost.
The fish tariff is an anti-dumping measure because Norway produces so much fish, the cheese tariff the other way around is Norway's retaliation to that tariff. It's an example of how they've negotiated with the EU, just like the Swiss and all their bilateral agreements. Switzerland know they are key in Europe because of their location, right at the heart of the continent. So they negotiate, an example being them wanting to introduce immigration controls despite it being "outlawed" by the EU.
We're a much bigger country, the fifth largest economy in the world, and let's face it; the EU does need us. The last thing it will want to do is completely alienate us in the negotiations. Yes there may be tariffs, but hey i'll just buy my cheese from somewhere else.
The EU is also completely useless at negotiating deals for services anyway, i.e. what the UK does best. And their trade deals also always work better for smaller countries, not us. See
here and
here.
The EU as a proportion of our trade has also (and will continue to) go down, see
here.
Over a 40+year timeframe (which is what we're voting for) we need to be able to negotiate
in our best interests as soon as possible, not having to reach compromise with 28+ countries and 500m+ people.
I thought the per capita contribution by Norway was only a bit less than ours. On my phone so feel free to google that.
Per capita it's about half what we currently pay according to the CBI. On a total basis Norway pays about £400m net to the EU per year compared to our £8.5bn. That's a huge difference. And you can't just multiply Norway's per capita total by the UK population, it doesn't work like that.
Can we provide details of an agreement with the EU post Brexit? No. But just because you can't guarantee you'll love a new job doesn't mean you shouldn't go for it. Other countries have successfully negotiated with the EU and we can as well. Their companies are driven by profit and will still want to trade with us, unlike the EU and it's political goals.
Will we then be able to negotiate better deals with the rest of the world that better represent Britain's interest? Yes. Can we remove vast red tape and bureaucracy that even the Government acknowledges is a massive problem? Yes. Will we then be politically tied to an economically stagnating area which will soon be 30+ countries? No.
Vote leave!
