NUS wants to ban gay men from LGBT+ commities.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Avenged7Fold said:
I don't care if my neighbour loves the taste of celery even though i hate it. I couldn't care less, i just don't want flyers through my door and adverts on TV telling me that its tasty and just that i have not discovered it yet. God damn celery eating *******s
Click to expand...

Are you using celery as a euphemism or analogy there :D.
 
Avenged7Fold said:
To clarify

No normal homosexual wants to wants to make it compulsory for anyone. In fact normal people regardless of sexuality, simply dont care about other peoples sexuality.

The fault lies with those so insecure about their sexuality because they are gay and feel the need to announce it, that they want other people to also be gay to justify their own identity.

The same way some odd straight people are so freaked out by the idea of homosexuality, they feel the need to make homosexuality anything other than a personal taste by being homophobic.

I don't care if my neighbour loves the taste of celery even though i hate it. I couldn't care less, i just don't want flyers through my door and adverts on TV telling me that its tasty and just that i have not discovered it yet, while waving a celery stick in my face. God damn celery eating *******s
Click to expand...

One of the things I like about my workplace is that in the 25 years I've been there I haven't met anyone who cares. Thousands of people from 18 to mid-90s and none of them care. In many ways it's a very civilised place.

Group identity advocates are loud and dangerous, but thankfully not all that common. They have power far beyond their numbers and that's a problem, but there are still many more people who understand that it's not reasonable to define everyone on the basis of a single biological trait that's irrelevent in most circumstances. If I want to have sex with you, your sexual orientation is relevant to me. If I don't, it isn't.
 
FoxEye said:
That's amazing. Their safe space policy includes this gem:



Emphasis mine.

A debate where you can't shake your dead, sigh, raise your voice... but must instead sit completely motionless, delivering your rebuttal in monotone, low-volume, non-accentuated speech.

Amazeballs.
Click to expand...

You are assuming that people are allowed to make a rebuttal at all. I think you're being overly optimistic in that respect, since it appears that the point is to silence any dissent.
 
SexyGreyFox said:
I'm still frustrated by it.
All my gay mates are straight acting and all my gay work mates are straight acting however 3 married men came out during my time at Creda/Hotpoint. In all 3 cases they turned from normal men into stereotypical camp men.
What gets me is that if they are trying to be effeminate they aren't because women don't act like that.
My gay mates don't understand it either.
Click to expand...

I've seen it as well. I think it's an identity thing, like the tendency for new converts to a religion to be particularly zealous. Born again, hallelujah, Allah is great and all that.

So I don't think they're trying to be effeminate. I think they're trying to be stereotypical camp men (or butch women, for the women who do it) because that's their idea of proclaiming their group identity blahblah. If they just behaved in an ordinary way, well, who'd know they were GAY? It's important that everyone knows they are GAY because it's so important to be GAY because GAY is what they are.

Of course, it isn't. It's just a bit of what they are, a little more important than whether they prefer tea or coffee and a little less important than which hand they favour. But group identity is a powerful idea.

I can understand if someone has been hiding something for years and then lets it out it can assume a huge importance to them. That doesn't stop it being annoying, though.
 
Mynight said:
[..]
Anyone know if straight females act aggressively towards lesbians?
Click to expand...

Some straight female people do and some don't, of course.

It's probably less common for female people than for male people (particular in countries where Christianity has been a strong influence), but it does happen.
 
Angilion said:
If they just behaved in an ordinary way, well, who'd know they were GAY? It's important that everyone knows they are GAY because it's so important to be GAY because GAY is what they are.
Click to expand...

I told the first one who 'came out' to me that I would keep it secret but he said "No, I want you to go to every gossip on the factory and tell them, I expect by the end of the day everybody knows". I approached about 5 of the main gossips with the words "Don't tell anybody but ..........".
The 2nd guy wanted the same but the third asked me to say nothing but still became camp after telling me!
 
Tefal said:
https://www.gaytimes.co.uk/news/319...es-remove-gay-mens-reps-dont-face-oppression/

http://www.pinknews.co.uk/2016/03/2...-mens-reps-because-they-dont-face-oppression/


So the NUS has decided that gay men dont face oppression.


This is disgraceful along with the no platforming crap theyve pulled on gay rights speakers.


It very much seems that they want thier own little group to bully ad "white cis men" are the target but too many to go after the straigjts so going for the gays.

Given it was the white cis gays who fought for most of these societies to even get started on the first place this seems insane
Click to expand...

Ridiculous.

Stonewall said:
We believe that LGBT societies should represent the full diversity of the LGBT community, including the multiple minority identities that exist within it. Gay men experience homophobia and oppression daily, both inside and outside the LGBT community. This could be because they are of faith, or have a disability, or are part of an ethnic minority. They also continue to face discrimination in the workplace, at school, in church, in institutions, or on the sports field. The fight against homophobia isn’t over yet.
Click to expand...

Absolutely ridiculous from the NUS - Stonewall are spot on.

The LGBT community is about support.
 
SexyGreyFox said:
I told the first one who 'came out' to me that I would keep it secret but he said "No, I want you to go to every gossip on the factory and tell them, I expect by the end of the day everybody knows". I approached about 5 of the main gossips with the words "Don't tell anybody but ..........".
The 2nd guy wanted the same but the third asked me to say nothing but still became camp after telling me!
Click to expand...

So the common factor in triggering their adoption of camp behaviour was actually speaking to you?
 
Tummy said:
[..]
The LGBT community is about support.
Click to expand...

No, it isn't. It's about group identity. It's normal for splintering to occur, since group identity often involves multiple identities. Since group identity is dominated by people who are profoundly sexist, expelling men from the group identity is an obvious step.

I reject group identity, so I am not part of the "LGBT community". Which, obviously, isn't a community anyway.
 
National Union of Students elects Malia Bouattia as president

A student who previously rejected a motion condemning the so-called Islamic State has been elected as the president of the National Union of Students.
Click to expand...

Well this should be entertaining! SJW overload, just what the NUS needs.

Tommy K
 
Malia.jpg


though she seems to go more for the frizzy haired look these days, perhaps to emphasize her 'blackness' so she can maintain a 'victim' status much treasured among interscetionist lefty types
 
Some black people can be surprisingly light skinned, or she may be mixed race but they are calling her black (which I find a touch annoying - Obama is mixed race yo!). I myself am quite light skinned (I am mixed race) but there ain't much sun in the Surrey countryside when I grew up :p

EDIT - is that her? Woa we got a Rachel Dolezal!!!
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom