The Queen's 90th Birthday

they have massive privilege by virtue of their position obtained by birth and noting else, its wrong.

Oh boo hoo, let's be angry and upset at anyone born into a better lifestyle than us! In fact, let's remove fame and fortune from everyone who has it because it's not fair that I don't have that either. It's not fair there are people out there who are better than me! Hmph, I refuse to believe that's true! :mad:


TO THE QUEEN!
 
they have massive privilege by virtue of their position obtained by birth and noting else, its wrong.

so have you.

you get free money if you dont work, free medicine, free schooling and free housing.

go bitch to all the people in Africa how you feel you're hard done by.
 
so have you.

you get free money if you dont work, free medicine, free schooling and free housing.

go bitch to all the people in Africa how you feel you're hard done by.
Indeedy.

Surely by his own view it is wrong that he gets all that, being born into it and all. He really ought to move himself to the most destitute part of the world, living in mud and drinking rat pee then work up from there before he can justify his current position life.

Oh the quandary!
 
Last edited:
see this is an interesting point, anti royals always prattle on about them being"scroungers" etc and that's why they should be removed.

but surely the child welfare angle is much more of a reason, being born into that family as the next in line is borderline indentured servitude.

your life is decided and you'll be doing appearances etc from a very young age.

100%.
From the day she became Queen she became a slave to the people with a few perks.
 
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...y-fund-to-heat-buckingham-palace-2088179.html

The Queen asked ministers for a poverty handout to help heat her palaces but was rebuffed because they feared it would be a public relations disaster, documents disclosed under the Freedom of Information Act reveal.

Royal aides were told that the £60m worth of energy-saving grants were aimed at families on low incomes and if the money was given to Buckingham Palace instead of housing associations or hospitals it could lead to "adverse publicity" for the Queen and the Government.

Aides complained to ministers in 2004 that the Queen's gas and electricity bills, which had increased by 50 per cent that year, stood at more than £1m a year and had become "untenable".

The Royal Household also complained that the £15m government grant to maintain the Queen's palaces was inadequate.

In search of more money-saving schemes, the Queen's deputy treasurer wrote to the Department for Culture, Media and Sport to ask whether the Royal Household would be eligible for a grant to replace four combined heat and power (CHP) units at Buckingham Palace and Windsor Castle.

He asked: "Community Energy can fund up to 40 per cent of the capital costs of implementing a community heating scheme... Since we are already grant-in-aid funded [the Queen receives £15m a year for the upkeep of her palaces] we would like to know whether the Household [would] be able to benefit from these grants. I look forward to your comments."

:D
 
How about abolishing the monarchy and setting the main palaces as tourist attractions? The entire "Royal Family" should be cut from our society.

In many ways people here are defending a group of people based on who they are. All people are equal unless you are part of the family. They are also corrupt and their past is and carries the same notion that we should be referring tyrants and shysters.

Someone said about her "working". Ha yes sure"work":rolleyes:
 
100%.
From the day she became Queen she became a slave to the people with a few perks.

Lol, that's massively distorting the reality to suit your pov :D

I'm no royalist, but I appreciate the level of work she does and by god I wouldn't want to do it...but it's risible to describe it as 'slavery with a few perks' :D:D:D

If she didn't like it she could always abdicate.
 
is borderline indentured servitude.
.

Oh please. What absolute bunkum. The royal family a slave family? The same family that has made countless billions from slavery are slaves themselves?

Just a scintilla of her wealth (that is in the many tens of billions) could ensure all of Londons homeless have somewhere to stay. Question things more than what the tabloids tell you to think. Its a bit like Wills and Kate (cousins) the "happy" couple.
 
How about abolishing the monarchy and setting the main palaces as tourist attractions? The entire "Royal Family" should be cut from our society.

In many ways people here are defending a group of people based on who they are. All people are equal unless you are part of the family. They are also corrupt and their past is and carries the same notion that we should be referring tyrants and shysters.

Someone said about her "working". Ha yes sure"work":rolleyes:

Read above, her working day is already covered here. I don't think many people would do that at 90.
 
Read above, her working day is already covered here. I don't think many people would do that at 90.

"Work" you forget what that "work" costs. The only individual in the world possibly who is guaranteed a pay rise each and every year by law. How much of it is for herself and how much of it is for the benefit of the people?

I long for the day when she and those like her who think blue blood preserves their lineage are thrown to the annals and the sycophantic hysteria that follows them has the truth revealed to them. Vast wealth and opulence that will not ever be shared. She is literally dripping in gold only to cover the horrors of history and the blood that is on her families hands
 
Someone said about her "working". Ha yes sure"work":rolleyes:

You couldn't do it.
Her normal working day is already covered above in big letters just in case you can't read.
When she finishes around 8pm she can't sit down and play a computer game or watch Game Of Thrones but probably goes straight to bed to repeat & rinse.
 
Talking about thier "vast wealth" they dont come close to business leaders.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2016/03/18/how-wealthy-is-the-queen-not-as-rich-as-you-think/


Queen worth about 3% of the richest man in britian lol.


There have been lottery winners with more money than the queen

I find that report highly misleading indeed. Much like the wealth of the Rothschilds, never or rarely mentioned as part of rich lists and yet a junior reporter found $20bn worth of wealth for Evelyn iirc and that's just what he is down on paper in one small area.

If you seriously believe the Queen is not as wealthy as lottery winners, well you wont want to take off the wooly jumper.

SGF said:
You couldn't do it.
Her normal working day is already covered above in big letters just in case you can't read.
When she finishes around 8pm she can't sit down and play a computer game or watch Game Of Thrones but probably goes straight to bed to repeat & rinse.

Really? Well I'm glad you know what people can and cannot do so well! Excellent judge of ability. She is only kept in her position by virtue or her ancestry, she is not elected and much of the past as well as the present behaviour of the Royals is having Stalins dictat applied to it : Erase the parts of history we don't like
 
"Work" you forget what that "work" costs. The only individual in the world possibly who is guaranteed a pay rise each and every year by law. How much of it is for herself and how much of it is for the benefit of the people?

I long for the day when she and those like her who think blue blood preserves their lineage are thrown to the annals and the sycophantic hysteria that follows them has the truth revealed to them. Vast wealth and opulence that will not ever be shared. She is literally dripping in gold only to cover the horrors of history and the blood that is on her families hands

I long for the day that diorrahea doesn't fall from people's mouths. Alas it will never happen.
 
Really? Well I'm glad you know what people can and cannot do so well!

No you couldn't do it, you have to be born into it and be prepared for it from when you are born.
None of us on these forums would be capable of serving the public 24/7 and live your life by a strict time sheet including your time off.
So yes I am an excellent judge of character on this particular job role.
 
No you couldn't do it, you have to be born into it and be prepared for it from when you are born.
None of us on these forums would be capable of serving the public 24/7 and live your life by a strict time sheet including your time off.
So yes I am an excellent judge of character on this particular job role.

Fell into my trap perfectly... So we abolish the monarchy and what happens to those critical meetings? I would be betting that a few people could oversee those engagements for a fraction of the cost and we would hope more altruistically than they are presently done. I found it most concerning seeing a homeless man just a stones throw away from Buckingham Palace when last I went to London. Where is the help for the average man?

Edit: Just to preponderate the position more it must clearly be impossible for republics to do anything without a monarchy... Just saying
 
Fell into my trap perfectly... So we abolish the monarchy and what happens to those critical meetings? I would be betting that a few people could oversee those engagements for a fraction of the cost and we would hope more altruistically than they are presently done.

How did I fall into a trap where if you bothered to look further up I already stated that the country could run without her.
The only problem is (besides her other jobs) she has over 430 engagements a year where her involvement helps to bring in lots of trade and other people won't have the same impact or respect that the Queen has.
Many people think it's all about tourism but that's only scratching the surface.
 
Back
Top Bottom