Tl;dr: He agrees
Most of that news story is something the UK could only dream of achieving. Imagine taking a million lorries a year off our roads
HS2 current budget at £42.6b![]()
[TW]Fox;29568505 said:Exactly - all the stuff in the way versus one mountain. Which effectively means that for tunneling purposes there was nothing in the way. Tunneling through a mountain is different to tunneling under cities etc.
But this isn't because they went 2.3km below the surface so much as because the mountain is 10,000 feet tall!
It took TWENTY YEARS!
Isn't it sad that this is a thread where we all just knock our own country with rubbish hyperbole and no real understanding instead of praising the achievements of others?
Great tunnel project. I love it.
To the people comparing it to HS2: I laugh at the people slating HS2. Once you begin to understand what's involved, you'll soon realise what we're planning to do is huge.
Joking aside, it's good to see someone else understand the impact/cost implication of a large project like this.
It might be because I'm an engineer. I appreciate large infrastructure projects.
Obviously I don't want to sound condescending and suggest non engineers don't appreciate the impact/cost implication of a large project like this - but I can't phrase myself any other way.
Only the new stations are expensive. The existing ones are minimal in the grand scheme of things.
They're new stations.
Did you read what I said?