Sorry, but we're at cross purposes here.
My view is that it is vital policy makers act to offset (as best as they can) the impact of negative shocks to an economy. Osborne and Cameron had a duty to offset any negative shock the economy would experience as the result of a Leave vote win. Instead, they deliberately inflated the negative shock of a Leave vote win for political purposes. That was simply game-playing, and worked to undermine market confidence, further increase uncertainty, amplify volatility and the negative impact of Leave winning. They behaved in a disgraceful way.
After all, Cameron was the one who called the referendum. It was his responsibility to analyze the consequence of a Leave or Remain win, and have measures developed and put in place to mitigate shocks as best as possible. That is the responsibility of the government, and in that it seems Cameron has failed: He's lazily and very belatedly announced that civil servents are going to start to look at Brexit. Cameron's relative inaction constitutes a dereliction of duty.