I'm still Conservative and won't think about change until I see how the future pans out when we formally invoke Article 50.
If May wins, we won't imo.
The pain and tears in this thread are strong.
Let it go and move on. If you don't like the result you can move to the EU where democracy doesn't matter which should suit all of you![]()
Well said.What tears?
You keep stating that nonsense, and yet I'm not seeing it.
People are stating they're unhappy with a vote result and discussing who they'd vote for under specific conditions.
This isn't any ******* tears it's pretty much the same sort of discussion you get about any controversial vote, it's just got more people interested as it's something that potentially affects a lot more people than "who do you vote for is tuition fees go up" or "who do you vote for if X becomes leader of the party".
I find it amusing that some of the people that are most happy with the fact that their choice won a vote on a 4% margin are claiming it's a huge victory and a massive majority and should be respected under all circumstances and to even discuss the fact that it could be over turned by another vote as undemocratic.
I guess our entire system is undemocratic given we overturn vote results on a pretty regular basis by voting differently in another election.
The pain and tears in this thread are strong.
Let it go and move on. If you don't like the result you can move to the EU where democracy doesn't matter which should suit all of you![]()
If we invoke article 50 there is a big chance my employers will wind down UK operations... = I will lose my job...
I am sorry if I don't want to move on...
I am very disappointed that so many people are looking to vote for parties who wish to overturn a democratically taken decision. Why can't they just accept the result with good grace.
What tears?
You keep stating that nonsense, and yet I'm not seeing it.
People are stating they're unhappy with a vote result and discussing who they'd vote for under specific conditions.
This isn't any ******* tears it's pretty much the same sort of discussion you get about any controversial vote, it's just got more people interested as it's something that potentially affects a lot more people than "who do you vote for is tuition fees go up" or "who do you vote for if X becomes leader of the party".
I find it amusing that some of the people that are most happy with the fact that their choice won a vote on a 4% margin are claiming it's a huge victory and a massive majority and should be respected under all circumstances and to even discuss the fact that it could be over turned by another vote as undemocratic.
I guess our entire system is undemocratic given we overturn vote results on a pretty regular basis by voting differently in another election.
None of them.
For the first time in my voting life (20 years) I feel utterly disillusioned with the whole ridiculous sham we have in this country that purports to be democracy.
If someone was to start a party based on honesty, transparency, true accountability and social equality with a convincing, honest leader I would imagine that they would waltz straight into power.
I can't be the only one who feels this way, surely?
Love this idea but sadly half our brain dead electorate would still keep voting tory/Labour/lib because they always have and there dad did etc!
Love this idea but sadly half our brain dead electorate would still keep voting tory/Labour/lib because they always have and there dad did etc!
It'd also take an electorate that realise that some decisions that governments have to take aren't all nice and fluffy but actually decisions where there isn't necessarily a "right" answer.
Politicians have to dress up a lot of what they say because quite simply, most of the public can't take or understand the truth.
Aye, it's much the same as people don't like to pay taxes, but also want all the services that are paid for through the taxes.
I had no sympathy for the people in my area who voted down a specific increase in council tax to pay for additional police, then complain when the police had to go ahead with cuts because they didn't get it.
From memory when experiments have been done where normal people have had to specificlaly choose what services they would be happy to see cut to save taxes they've typically found they didn't want to cut anything (or no two people could agree on exactly what to cut).
Or they vote for even worse parties than the main three, because its good to stick one up to the man, isn't it?
And thoughtless protest votes lead us to the situation we're in now.
It'd also take an electorate that realise that some decisions that governments have to take aren't all nice and fluffy but actually decisions where there isn't necessarily a "right" answer.
Politicians have to dress up a lot of what they say because quite simply, most of the public can't take or understand the truth.
It would. I'm not sure I'd vote for a party who wanted to then rejoin the EU as we would rejoin with no veto, rebate and all the other benefits and opt outs we had negotiated over the years.
True, sometimes the government can't give everyone a free puppy but I do wish they would at least give a little thought to the huge disparity in society between the have's and the have nots, current levels of executive pay and the rises they get are truly obscene and make a mockery of 'the we are all in this together' thing!