Age verification for porn sites coming in 2017

Video games and movies weren't around at the time the Bible was written, so they aren't ingrained as bad with the aged 50+ right-leaning average Tory party member in the way that sex is.
 
Caged said:
Video games and movies weren't around at the time the Bible was written, so they aren't ingrained as bad with the aged 50+ right-leaning average Tory party member in the way that sex is.
Click to expand...

Don't talk crap.
We 50+ were having private parties with films on reel and having a collection at strip nights so they would lock the doors for the saucy stuff.
I know that my 80 year old Dad and all his mates were going to these parties in the 60s.
In the early 70s I had to be very careful putting my Dads collection back in the exact same place.
In the 80s there were people you could get videos off and so on who had a very lucrative business on the factory I worked at.
You young uns have no idea how lucky you are to have the internet where you don't have to try like we 50+ had to.
I don't know one 50+ who didn't have dirt when they were younger and probably still have it now.
 
[TW]Fox;29759794 said:
If there is a case to legislate against pornographic material and ban certain types of it, as has been done, then fair enough. But how can it possibly not be applied to other forms of media?

Why as a society do we seem to not care about extreme violence?
Click to expand...

It's as bizarre as it is fascinating,

/boring anecdote

I was stood in the shop only a day or two ago, and the front-page of the daily whatever, was ranting and raving about how ITV had shown a "sex scene" at 9pm, and how this was so utterly terrible, and a "new low" for "British telly"

Then I remembered the time Sky news showed clips of ISIS pushing blindfolded homosexuals off rooftops (ok some of it was censored) in the middle of the daytime, and nobody batted an eyelid..

It frankly confuses the hell out of me - why is it so terrible to watch something sexy, yet perfectly fine to watch people get butchered.. It's complete and total nonsense..
 
SexyGreyFox said:
Don't talk crap.
We 50+ were having private parties with films on reel and having a collection at strip nights so they would lock the doors for the saucy stuff.
I know that my 80 year old Dad and all his mates were going to these parties in the 60s.
In the early 70s I had to be very careful putting my Dads collection back in the exact same place.
In the 80s there were people you could get videos off and so on who had a very lucrative business on the factory I worked at.
You young uns have no idea how lucky you are to have the internet where you don't have to try like we 50+ had to.
I don't know one 50+ who didn't have dirt when they were younger and probably still have it now.
Click to expand...

Some things should not be shared.

Screeeech said:
It's as bizarre as it is fascinating,

/boring anecdote

I was stood in the shop only a day or two ago, and the front-page of the daily whatever, was ranting and raving about how ITV had shown a "sex scene" at 9pm, and how this was so utterly terrible, and a "new low" for "British telly"

Then I remembered the time Sky news showed clips of ISIS pushing blindfolded homosexuals off rooftops (ok some of it was censored) in the middle of the daytime, and nobody batted an eyelid..

It frankly confuses the hell out of me - why is it so terrible to watch something sexy, yet perfectly fine to watch people get butchered.. It's complete and total nonsense..
Click to expand...

If you find out how the broadcasting/bodies work you'll let us know, right?
 
Last edited:
SexyGreyFox said:
I've never voted for anybody, I don't know enough.
However when I was a teenager we had Mary Whitehouse & Lord Longford who stopped us looking at boobies.
Click to expand...

But are you a Tory party member? Because if you aren't then your rebuttal to my point that older Tory party members are scared of sex with your story about porn through the ages, while interesting, wasn't relevant.
 
Caged said:
But are you a Tory party member? Because if you aren't then your rebuttal to my point that older Tory party members are scared of sex with your story about porn through the ages, while interesting, wasn't relevant.
Click to expand...

You are accusing him of posting barely-semi-relevant anecdotes?

Outrageous :eek:
 
Caged said:
But are you a Tory party member? Because if you aren't then your rebuttal to my point that older Tory party members are scared of sex with your story about porn through the ages, while interesting, wasn't relevant.
Click to expand...

No, you are stereotyping Tory party members when it is known they have had some of the best sex scandals ever. You are picking on the wrong party.

Fox can't disagree with that.
 
Sex scandals amongst MPs isn't the same as attitudes within the party membership, though. Members being the paid-up supporters picking the next PM, not the parliamentary group. The membership isn't really known for liberal attitudes to anything.
 
Caged said:
Sex scandals amongst MPs isn't the same as attitudes within the party membership, though. Members being the paid-up supporters picking the next PM, not the parliamentary group. The membership isn't really known for liberal attitudes to anything.
Click to expand...

What they say is different to what they do - you should know that.
Men are men.
 
Well it's how they vote that is important. If the party as a whole didn't see prohibition and 'think of the children' attitudes to legislation as a positive thing then May wouldn't have ended up as home secretary.
 
Hikari Kisugi said:
Strange thing is, original saw was a suoerb film with a decent twist, just happened to have violence along the way, i have nothing against either type of extreme, as long as it is comtextual. Adult films are there for a reason, i don't have anything against either, yet in an increasingly violent society more is being done to protect children from one and not the other.
Click to expand...

Saw is a great film, I love films with a plot twist
 
Caged said:
Well it's how they vote that is important. If the party as a whole didn't see prohibition and 'think of the children' attitudes to legislation as a positive thing then May wouldn't have ended up as home secretary.
Click to expand...

but men are men, while voting one way they'll be wondering how they will get their dirt or just stick to their collection.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom