Still doesn't make it a true high end part.
What exactly does make a 'high end part'? Is it performance respective to its contemporary peers? Is it the die size or memory bus width? Or are you actually saying its not high end - in the expected eventually available Pascal line-up including cards as yet unreleased and in announced?
Pascal's only likely (based on past recent history) to get one more card a '1080Ti' and possibly a Pascal Titan 'X' 'Black' or something similar with the full die enabled unlike the current Pascal Titan X.
Perhaps it comes down to semantics but the Titan X (and if released the Titan X 'Black') are very high end with the 1080Ti (if released) being next then the 1080.
Ultimately surely the best test of what is high end at any one time is performance... what else matters? You cant play memory bus size or die size now can you? It also a rather arbitrary distinction to talk about performance only with regards to the 'Pascal' branded GPU's because guess what shortly after your beloved 'high end' Pascals are all out a 'mid range' (in your eyes) but yet faster Volta card will most likely be out.
I have already explained why a pricing structure based on your definition of 'mid rage' would be a complete non starter for Nvidia or anyone else
here.
It's a replacement for the 980, which it is a good deal faster than.
There is no replacement for the 980ti as of yet.
I'm not sure why you'd buy a 1080 to replace a 980ti and expect a huge jump in performance.
Its the next high performance card released by Nvidia after the 980ti which it beats comprehensively stock vs stock and oc vs oc across the board the fact that its branded an 'XX'80 card is all rather arbitrary and does not necessarily indicate anything other than the marketing departments current whims.
The single GPU fastest top end NVIDIA cards for each generation used to be a 'X'800GTX or an 'X'80 (i.e. 7800, 8800GTX/ 8800GTX Ultra, 280GTX 480GTX, 580GTX etc) so in that sense the 1080GTX would be the very best single GPU card for Pascal right? No its not because the marketing people bought in the 'Ti' and 'Titan' branding
I'm not suggesting that a 1080 is a good replacement for a 980ti. Why on earth would you think that given the relatively small incremental gains from one top end card to the next that it would represent a 'good' upgrade? It is an upgrade none the less across the board and so until the Pascal Titan X came out was most definitely the 'top end' performance wise.
And judging by the general forums and MM lots of 980ti owners
DID think the 1080GTX was a worthwhile upgrade over the 980ti just like when I swapped out a 'high end' Titan 'mk1' for a 'mid range' 980GTX