What exactly is the problem with a consolidated army though?
I personally would prefer a combined force than to see Corbyn in charge of it.
Well, who decides when and how to use it for a start? That's a pretty big issue I would say. I know a lot of remainers are putting great stock in this notion that sovereignty is something of a joke to be laughed at, but it really isn't. King Louis XIV had the words "The Last Argument of Kings" inscribed onto his cannons, if you don't have any cannons then you don't have any last argument. Would an EU Army, with the UK in it, have been prepared to go and defend the Falklands for example? or intervene in former British colony Sierra Leone? Would we be able to continue in the Anglo "five-eyes" intelligence sharing agreement, which is incredibly useful in the fight against terror?
I don't want to see Corbyn in charge either, but if that's what we as a nation vote for then it must be accepted. I think there'll be consequences of having a wet lettuce in charge of our armed forces and if it happens we'll learn what those consequences are the hard way. At least we'd be able to recover from a bad PM, I'm not so sure it'd be that simple with another few decades of ever closer union.