Did the Moon-men have a sense of humour?

I am saying the astronauts filmed though a porthole then moved back and filmed to try and show earth from a further distance when in fact they were still in low earth orbit.

I don't understand what you're implying... so you're saying that if you're 2000km away from something, you can move a couple of feet back and it will look further away?
 
The burden of proof lies with you good sir, since you made the claims that there were faked photos.

But it's ok, I wouldn't expect anything concrete from you :)

Like I say I don't have the time and you don't have the effort :) plus you are reading this as Zomg Raoh thinks the moon landings were faked. What I really said was I know some of the shots were faked in reference to images taken of earth from alleged differences.

You're the one making the sensationalist remarks, so it up to YOU to prove it. That's how it works - it's called burden of proof ;)

Well given this is GD one of two things would happen I) it would be ignored or ii) goalposts would be shifted.

Ah, I see. Since we were talking about the landings I assumed that you were including lunar surface photos amongst those being faked. My bad!

No I have no issue with lunar surface shots. Seen plenty of debunking clips and evidence to support eg like there is a UFO there that can reasonable be shown to be dust particles.

Its just a shot done of earth that is allegedly say 150,000miles away when it was done in the same shot as the low earth orbit takes... That's it.
 
As to why subsequent landings haven't been made, seems to be down to money and ambition, they want bigger and better which means more money and fancier tech.

They did land another 5 times after Apollo 11.


I'd like to know what the USA sent up there so Ham Radio enthusiasts could listen into the transmissions. I helped my Grandad turn his aerial so we could listen in.

If it was faked why did Russia give up? Russia would definitely know if it was faked or not.

I was watching a feature film last weel called THE DISH about the Australian dish that transmitted the video signals. That got me wondering about all the other 1000s of dishes around the World that must have been listening in to the FAKE event and nobody blagged.

The more you think about it being faked the more it sounds ridiculous.
 
No they can't. Unless you think the sun was snuggled up behind the rocks when the photo was taken.

They can actually when elevations are factored in. The evidence proving this was on one show I watched done by some professor who used a lampost shadow to prove the angle of a shadow can vary when it went down a crub, I believe he also did a lab experiment on a dustbin or something daft and said the angle altered by xxdegrees

I don't understand what you're implying... so you're saying that if you're 2000km away from something, you can move a couple of feet back and it will look further away?

Well yes you can do that. You could do it with your mobile phone, a piece of card with a hole in it and simply move your phone closer to the hole and further away to give that impression... Not difficult. They did this within the rocket.

They said we are now in low earth orbit and stuck the camera right up against the porthole... They then claimed to be (example distance only) 15,000miles away and moved the camera back, still maintaining and giving the illusion of earth appearing as round for the purpose of perspective that it would be at that distance.
 
Whenever I see Buzz Aldrin he seems a nice enough guy. He also believes he saw Aliens <snip>

There's a good number of us who've seen Aliens as well, although I myself prefer the Special Edition over the original cinema release.

We definitely went there though... after physically seeing the kit they've got at Kennedy, and the shuttle there, there's no way they could fake anything like that without at least 70p worth of gaffer tape and a couple of coloured filters for their cameras.
 
We have cheese, therefor we went there and still go back regularly to top up our supplies. This is a 100% fact as I have a cheese sandwich for lunch today.
 
There's a good number of us who've seen Aliens as well, although I myself prefer the Special Edition over the original cinema release.

We definitely went there though... after physically seeing the kit they've got at Kennedy, and the shuttle there, there's no way they could fake anything like that without at least 70p worth of gaffer tape and a couple of coloured filters for their cameras.

Again... I don't disagree we went to the moon. The only comment that drew ire on here that I made was that some shots of earth from the craft were faked. No mention of "we didn't go to the moon" or "we didn't because xyz".

You can still believe one thing even if something for it has been faked. Like I say, probably done to save time as can imagine they were busy... Being the first humans to go to the big asteroid and all.
 
Well yes you can do that. You could do it with your mobile phone, a piece of card with a hole in it and simply move your phone closer to the hole and further away to give that impression... Not difficult. They did this within the rocket.

They said we are now in low earth orbit and stuck the camera right up against the porthole... They then claimed to be (example distance only) 15,000miles away and moved the camera back, still maintaining and giving the illusion of earth appearing as round for the purpose of perspective that it would be at that distance.

I think you've got your perspectives the wrong way round. Closer to the portal the object would fill less of it and appear more distant. Away from the portal the object would fill more of and appear less distant.

Either way, it's grasping at straws if you're going to cite it as evidence of faked footage.
 
Like I say I don't have the time and you don't have the effort :) plus you are reading this as Zomg Raoh thinks the moon landings were faked. What I really said was I know some of the shots were faked in reference to images taken of earth from alleged differences.


Its just a shot done of earth that is allegedly say 150,000miles away when it was done in the same shot as the low earth orbit takes... That's it.

Man, what a cop-out :(

If you had the proof for this I would absolutely put the effort into reading it, but since you're not forthcoming with this evidence I'm afraid I'm gonna have to chalk you up as a loon, sorry about that old chap.
 
We did land on the moon but I do know a lot of shots were in fact faked. Its been proven by many many video and photography experts. This was likely done for propaganda purposes.

Whenever I see Buzz Aldrin he seems a nice enough guy. He also believes he saw Aliens but of course he is a crackpot low intelligence nutter who happens to have multiple degrees

:rolleyes:
he does not believe he saw aliens at all. he saw a ufo, he has said many times he does not think or believe it was aliens.

and no, you know nothing, as proved by pretty much every single post you have ever made.
 
I think you've got your perspectives the wrong way round. Closer to the portal the object would fill less of it and appear more distant. Away from the portal the object would fill more of and appear less distant.

Either way, it's grasping at straws if you're going to cite it as evidence of faked footage.

Well if you have the time Danny...

Find a picture poster on a wall... Find a bit of card and cut a ping pong sized hole into it... Now start filming with your phone camera right up against the hole. Then stop and do the same from further away... Bet you cant film the whole picture through the hole but you know its filmed through a hole because the card evidences it as does its size in relative to a perspective from where you are filming from. Can tell some people haven't don't A Level photography on the module of perspectives and angles.

Its basically a trick ergo faked. Why they did it is anyone's guess but they did.
 
Back
Top Bottom