Probably, but it still begs the question - why should things less representative be banned?
If they are divisive - which the burkha, and burkhini clearly are.
Probably, but it still begs the question - why should things less representative be banned?
Another double standard: Allowing non muslim french women to wear whatever they want to the beach (including head coverings), but banning muslim women from wearing burkinis.
Exactly.
It's a pair of leggings and a swimming cap, oh and a long sleeve shirt lol.
Leggings.
Swimming cap.
Shirt.
That's it.
Cant believe the ****storm some muslims wearing a combination of above items of clothing is causing. ok fair enough it's far from stylish but who the heck cares? Forcing people to remove clothing is some seriously messed up stuff.
If they are divisive - which the burkha, and burkhini clearly are.
Lol. Standby to be labelled a limp wristed lefty Liberal terrorist sympathising scum bag. Shame on you!![]()
Advice, pay no attention and don't click on links about muslim stories.
Is that advice to yourself?
. It still sounds to me like you are arguing that because the certain counties in the middle east have authoritarian, sexist policies France should to?
Another double standard: Allowing non muslim french women to wear whatever they want to the beach (including head coverings), but banning muslim women from wearing burkinis.
French PM suggests naked breasts represent France better than a headscarf
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2016/aug/30/france-manuel-valls-breasts-headscarf-burkini-ban-row
[..]
*Out of interest why do we call it a "pair" of trunks, or "pair of boxers/trousers etc? Last time I checked I only put one boxer(s) on in the morning.![]()
A display of antagonistic policies doesn't really help.
I'm not talking about those who have already put there alligence with terrorists, but the everyday folk who get reinforcement of 'us vs them'.
it should be a worldwide ban i admire france for their stance. If they want to wear burkas they should stay back in the countries where its normal i would like to get rid of it here in england. When i walk through town here in yorkshire i see loads of them its not normal and we should not put up with it.
People who dismiss it as being just trousers, a long sleeved shirt and a bathing cap are either completely failing to understand the point or are pretending to do so for rhetorical reasons. Symbols chosen to display a particular meaning and/or to proclaim allegience to a particular ideology have far more meaning than their literal ones. A Christian cross is just two lines...but it isn't. A white flag is just a piece of cloth...but it isn't. A CND symbol is just a few lines in a circle...but it isn't. An orange sash is just a piece of cloth...but it isn't (not in Ireland, anyway). And so on.
[..]
I guess seeing a crescent moon and stars also evoke this same irrational responses in you? When you see a crescent moon in the sky do you think Allah is trolling you?![]()
Am trying, trust me I am trying.
Why is religion even discussed in the 21st century, I thought it was a personal thing that you keep to yourself, as in ones personal belief in god.
Its all absolutely ****ing ridiculous.
The fact its even a topic is ridiculous, if you want to look like a seal on the seaside so be it.
Why in this day and age do people care?
Now the letter box people I have an issue with, but if I can see your face who bloody cares if you dress like my nan in the sun.
You are very nearly there. I am saying they have these laws and nobody bats an eyelid. That is a double standard.
Eg our standard is this but then the other country does this and oh well, that's ok then.
Well as we said at the start of this thread: I) France imposed a ban thus its their rules and II) the ban has now been lifted so this should be the end of the discussion, no?
History. Leg coverings used to be two seperate pieces in many places, including England. To get the general idea, imagine just the legs from a pair of trousers, cut off at upper thigh level. They were held up by being tied to the clothing you were wearing on your torso, your underwear or a form of belt. Same sort of setup as a suspender belt and stockings, but without any gap between the hose and the torso clothing. The length of the hose could vary from long shorts to complete leg and foot coverings with soles.
You can see examples by looking for "medieval hose" or if you want a slightly more detailed explanation you could watch the beginning of this video on arming garments, which is what you should wear under medieval armour, especially a full plate harness. I'll link rather than embed the video as that seems to be the preferred way outside of the video thread.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eQDMtFiDaEA
I recommend the whole channel if you have any interest in medieval English armour, by the way. There is a lot of detail.