It's still so cute when people who had things go their way point out one way "democracy".
Not as cute as when people who didn't have things go their way start suggesting that the people who didn't bother to vote actually agreed with them.
It's still so cute when people who had things go their way point out one way "democracy".
It's still so cute when people who had things go their way point out one way "democracy".
fixed
Lol what? Nige has been paid by the EU to be an MEP, what scams has he been running again?
No, 52% of people who voted. An annoyingly subtle distinction.
34% of the voters.

I'm quite frankly sick of the whiners who can't accept the result. We don't re-run general elections if we don't get the answer you're looking for
Not as cute as when people who didn't have things go their way start suggesting that the people who didn't bother to vote actually agreed with them.
Or the small number of racist bigots who think that a very slim majority vote means that they now have a legitimised platform for their views?
I'm quite frankly sick of the whiners who can't accept the result. We don't re-run general elections if we don't get the answer you're looking for
It is still way closer to the truth than the 34% comment above that i replied to, how come you didn't correct that poster, Jas72 above?
I thought the facts, actual facts and not merely what the so-called experts think, haven't shown any statistical increase in racist incidents post-Brexit? Facts like the number of actual prosecutions for hate crimes for example.
I know that "so-called" experts aren't fashionable because they get in the way of your rhetoric, but there's a reasonable amount of news about to say that there has been an increase.
I'm sorry I can't find you a Breitbart link to swallow blindly.
But the figures aren't 'proven crimes' in the past vs random allegations now. It's not comparing apples with oranges. It's the change in recorded instances of crimes from last year to this year, and from before the referendum to shortly after it and a while after it. That can't be shrugged off with a 'lol it's not convictions so EVERYTHING IS A-OKAY'. The figures aren't an important measure, even if it's not just convictions... it's normal to use such stats, given how with many crimes there isn't a conviction. If they didn't, the crime stats wouldn't reflect reality by a massive margin.
Just going, 'lol it's only reported crimes, who gives a smeg?' seems the wrong approach.