• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

(gamegpu) Battlefield 1 Benchmarks

Gregster said:
AMD sponsored game?
Click to expand...

I don't think it is tbh. They are giving away some free bf1 stuff with rx480's but not the game. Amd do have a decent relationship with dice but so have Nvidia as far as i know. Most dice games run great on Nvidia whether Amd were involved or not.

Brazo said:
Only game (ever) where the 970 beats the 1060!
Click to expand...

The 1060's performance is slightly weird in that sense. Possibly a miss print as it's beating it comfortably at 1440p.
 
Last edited:
TheRealDeal said:
Your video was an empty server with nothing happening while the ops benchmark was done on the single player i think. The ops test has plenty happening on screen so should be closer to real world performance although Multiplayer usually differs from SP. From previous tests i have seen dx12 gave Amd a nice boost when on a server with people playing and a slight drop when in an empty server.


Click to expand...

If it's a like-for-like comparison, with the same 'load' in either case why would results change so much, that makes no sense. It seems like quite an objective comparison. Due to the random nature of multiplayer games, getting a (repeatable) balanced benchmark would be exceedingly difficult between two cards.
 
southernorth said:
If it's a like-for-like comparison, with the same 'load' in either case why would results change so much, that makes no sense. It seems like quite an objective comparison. Due to the random nature of multiplayer games, getting a (repeatable) balanced benchmark would be exceedingly difficult between two cards.
Click to expand...

Well there's not much load happening on an empty server. Dx12 is at it's best when there is lots happening. An empty server is about as far removed as you can get from actual game play.

Here is the same guy doing both a controlled test and actual 64 player testing.

 
Just ordered a 4gb 480 Nitro...will performance be similar to the 8gb @ 1080 assuming it does not utilize all the memory?

Also pleased to see the performance, I assume the 8350 clocked to 4.7ghz will be hitting similar to the 9590??

Maybe my investment in AMD 3 years ago is finally paying off :D
 
Last edited:
Just been looking at a few benchmarks with 4gb vs 8gb 480's and pretty much nothing in it. Should see some good performance with my setup.
 
Another game without mGPU support in DX12.

DX12 is shaping up to be the most useless API ever.

Bring back Mantle pleased......
 
Almost forgot

The figures in the OP look very dodgy.

When you try and run a 2 way setup in DX12 where there is no support, it is not uncommon to get a drop in performance compared to a single card solution.

The graphs in the OP don't reflect this, are their mGPU figures just made up ?
 
SiDeards73 said:
That 480 is spanking the 1060 in DX11 let alone DX12...
Click to expand...

nashathedog said:
It's good to see the Fury giving the 1070 a run for it's money, actually it's giving it a sound thrashing.
Click to expand...
Today I'm learning that something of a 5% performance gap or so is 'absolutely destroying' in comparison.

I'd call that a laughable exaggeration, but ok.

hyperseven said:
Do they let Boost 3.0 run rampant when conducting these/any benchmarks or are clocks locked to a set frequency?
Click to expand...
Why would that be relevant?
 
Seanspeed said:
Today I'm learning that something of a 5% performance gap or so is 'absolutely destroying' in comparison.

I'd call that a laughable exaggeration, but ok.
Click to expand...

The Fury isn't beating the 1070 by anything eye raising but the 480 is a good bit ahead of the 1060 tbh.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom