I've read all of your drivel in this thread, though only god knows why.
He happens to be one of the worst posters in GD at the moment and that takes some doing!
Cyclists are allowed to use the roads. Get over it Diddums.
I've read all of your drivel in this thread, though only god knows why.
Sorry for coming on a little strong, but you really don't seem to be displaying much analytical thought in this approach. It's also hard not to automatically get defensive in yet another GD thread which from the outset is antagonistic towards cyclists.
You said (provided it's in decent condition ofc) but neglected to say: a) what you consider to be decent condition, b) how we legislate this decent condition (as after all if we're then forcing people to use dedicated cycle lanes, we need some way of measuring their quality), and c) when your journey is being delayed by another few seconds because of a cyclist flaunting this law, what the necessary actions would be, and d) what potential penalties you want.
We need to actively be discouraging people from driving. Introducing ill-thought out barriers to alternatives won't achieve this.
He happens to be one of the worst posters in GD at the moment and that takes some doing!
Cyclists are allowed to use the roads. Get over it Diddums.
but I don't see why people are risking their lives and the lives of others to save 15 seconds at best when there is a perfectly useable and safe alternative next to it.
Thank you for your valued, well thought out contribution to this thread![]()
Then you've lived the dream. If the commitment to cycling was anything like it is in Holland and, say Denmark, you'd not only get significantly higher numbres of cyclists sticking solely to cycling infrastructure, but you'd have also have a lot more people making their daily journies on bikes instead of driving. You'd have fewer cars on the road, and a healthier population.This is why we're discussing it. None of us want a loved one injured or killed on the roads, so anything we can do to reduce the numbers is a good thing. I've lived in Holland where the infrastructure is excellent. I would often cycle 30ish miles on a Sunday and only ever have to touch a "car road" for the purposes of crossing it. That's the way I'd like to see it here but obviously we don't have the space or the ability to shut the roads to achieve it without causing massive chaos. I fully acknowledge that many of the cycle facilities in this country are run down crap which would bring a Jeep to its knees but I don't see why people are risking their lives and the lives of others to save 15 seconds at best when there is a perfectly useable and safe alternative next to it.
This is it basically. Government commitment to cycling is absolutely lip service, and its quite evident that whilst the car is still king, they don't really give a damn. Look at the Transport Secretary commiting a road offence - dooring a cyclist. What did he do? Immediately blame the cyclist. It's a poor example overall, but it shows the attitude towards cycling in this country.I dont mean to sound patronising, but unless you're a regular cyclist, you never would understand why we dont use them.
Stop every 30m, avoid glass and debris, avoid road junctions etc.....
or just ride on the road where it's quicker and safer. No brainer.
Did you actually read anything I've posted, or simply see the word "cyclist" and automatically get defensive and play the victim card?
Cyclist training should indeed be compulsory - for everyone, not just cyclists. I see idiot pedestrians, drivers and cyclists all the time.
My apologies. I got you mixed up with another poster beginning with D!
Although my second line still stands![]()
You are the one playing the poor motorist victim card because you had to wait 10 seconds to get past a cyclist.
It wouldn't be so bad if the existing rules were enforced.
When I used to cycle, I hated riding in the road as cars pass so close, I never got used to it and found it very uncomfortable so would always opt for a path if available, I cant believe any other cyclist would pick the road over a cycle lane if they had confidence it would be clear!
Why do so many cyclists always pull the 'motorists are probably on their phone' card. Its getting boring now.
It's getting boring seeing motorists on their phones. It's getting really boring reading about yet another road user killed because a driver was on their mobile phone. Your blasé attitude towards it aside, it's become endemic, and needs drastic action.
Perhaps instead of flapping and flaming when asked a question about your precious cycling habits you could actually take a second or two to explain why you do what you do, then others could understand it a bit better?
Fair enough. I'll ignore the slight smell of condescension as you clearly put a lot of effort in to that post, well done![]()