The Donald Gunna Be Mad.

Plot twist: Russia did hack the DNC, however it was actually Snowden who did it, so technically not Russia. But he did so under duress in order to maintain his asylum in the country and so the Russians could maintain plausible deniability that they didn't actually do it themselves, while it was really a US citizen this whole time! :eek:
 
Plot twist: Russia did hack the DNC, however it was actually Snowden who did it, so technically not Russia. But he did so under duress in order to maintain his asylum in the country and so the Russians could maintain plausible deniability that they didn't actually do it themselves, while it was really a US citizen this whole time! :eek:

Proof?
 
Plot twist: Russia did hack the DNC, however it was actually Snowden who did it, so technically not Russia. But he did so under duress in order to maintain his asylum in the country and so the Russians could maintain plausible deniability that they didn't actually do it themselves, while it was really a US citizen this whole time! :eek:

You've taken those dodgy Berocca pills haven't you :D
 
One moment Trump is a fascist dictator, next minute he's a wimp who can be pushed around. It's almost as if you dream-up the worst possible scenario and just assert that it "will" happen.

You mean I am doing what Trump has been doing? flip-flopping? Where did I learn that? :eek:

When he does it you are all...ooooh, yeah, he is our idol, our lord and saviour, when I do it, wait, you can't do that!
 
Last edited:
Smells like butthurt democrats exercising a little bit of power whilst they still can.


Absolutely, just like Wreck-It Brown when he left - "sod the country, lets screw everything up for the new guys so that we can shout at them for not being to fix things once they get in power" - although I'm sure all departing Governments probably do the same :D
 
Democrats keep pointing to Russia hacking to distract from the fact that they rigged their primary nomination for a candidate that couldn't even beat Trump. The best part is they couldn't stop laughing when Trump democratically won the Republican nomination.
 
Last edited:
What will be the key differences, in real terms? Eg. with regards to Syria does that just mean that Hilary would have maintained that Assad is a knob and should leave in any peace plan etc, whilst Trump would nosh off Russia and allow them to prop up their proxy state? 'Cause giving up and allowing a war criminal to remain in power is lol.

Except for all the other states being proxy states of the US?

I guess if the US does it, you must love it then.
 
The Donald Gunna Be Mad.
Has he been triggered on Twitter about it yet?

bRYptmEm.png.jpg
 
Really? Your reply is "Trump started it"?

Isn't that one of Trump's replies? "He started it", that's what a 5 year old says! Replies one television news anchor.

What's good for the goose is good for the gander.

If you are so quick to pick up on me on this how come you didn't criticise Trump for a year for spewing this BS?

The thing is, I am doing this on purpose to point out your hypocrisy, what's his excuse? What's your excuse for not criticising him?
 
Last edited:
What's good for the goose is good for the gander.
I hear he likes to hit himself in the head with a brick too. Off you go.
If you are so quick to pick up on me on this how come you didn't criticise Trump for a year for spewing this BS?
I find incessant sneering of lefty ideologues to be more egregious.
The thing is, I am doing this on purpose to point out your hypocrisy...
Of course you are.
 
Smells like butthurt democrats exercising a little bit of power whilst they still can.

I did wonder that prior to a discussion yesterday with an acquaintance. He mentioned he helped provide some of the evidence to the US (military member) - but didn't tell me what the evidence was, obviously.

He's not someone that bull***** and also mentioned it would be in the news today, so I'm inclined to be more lenient that the US does actually have evidence linking Russia.
 
I did wonder that prior to a discussion yesterday with an acquaintance. He mentioned he helped provide some of the evidence to the US (military member) - but didn't tell me what the evidence was, obviously.

He's not someone that bull***** and also mentioned it would be in the news today, so I'm inclined to be more lenient that the US does actually have evidence linking Russia.

Only one way to find out: Trump must take his briefings. :p
 
He wont be a whipping boy to Putin, but he will be more cordial in his relations and ease the pressure off between the two countries a million times more than Hilary would have done.

TBH I'm not entirely sure what the issue with this is. Just as with the Israeli issue the US seems to want to stick to premises no matter what the current evidence says.
 
I did wonder that prior to a discussion yesterday with an acquaintance. He mentioned he helped provide some of the evidence to the US (military member) - but didn't tell me what the evidence was, obviously.

He's not someone that bull***** and also mentioned it would be in the news today, so I'm inclined to be more lenient that the US does actually have evidence linking Russia.

Well, a very close friend of mine is a Lt. Col. in SOCOM. He used to fly 130H Combat Talon IIs from Hurlburt before he transferred out to operations due to injury, and he reckons it's a load of ********.

So, yeah!
 
Back
Top Bottom