Shots fired outside parliament - Please refrain from speculative and antagonistic posts

mattcrane said:
Sky news did put out a description a few minutes ago but not heard it repeated yet.
Click to expand...

I heard that as well and also forget who the source was.
What I do remember is them saying the attacker looked to be between 40-50 and was believed to be one of the casualties near the vehicle being treated.

Given they haven't repeated it, there probably isn't a lot to verify it yet.
 
Tefal said:
Only if diddums has had zero interaction with the world for the past 2 decades.


Based purely on the MO which group would you think this was caused by?
Click to expand...

You probably missed it since the thread is moving so quickly, but I'm still waiting for you to show where I blamed all muslims in an ironic sense
 
TwsT said:
"gotcha" was the headline the sun went with right?
Click to expand...

You believe that the MO of this attack was that the attacker used a nuclear attack submarine to fire torpedoes at a battleship?

Well that's certainly an interesting interpretation of events
 
Tefal said:
You believe that the MO of this attack was that the attacker used a nuclear attack submarine to fire torpedoes at a battleship?

Well that's certainly an interesting interpretation of events
Click to expand...


No I believe that everyone is capable even in times of war when the evidence looks 100% obvious of getting it wrong. (In short I'm not going to say who i think is responsible or why they did it, I feel that it serves of no benefit to assume.)
 
Tefal said:
Only if diddums has had zero interaction with the world for the past 2 decades.


Based purely on the MO which group would you think this was caused by?
Click to expand...
Why try and guess though? In a few hours we will know but oh no " to the internet it must be Isis" sigh
 
Amazing that I can't say **** on here but people can get away with espousing there horse**** racist
opinions. To quote a better man then I, the internet has purposefully confused 'free speech' with 'free speech without consequence'. The very best of wishes to all those effected.
 
Seems to now look like it was the same person driving the car as was shot by the armed police. So nothing to suggest it was anything more than one person, who has now been neutralised?
 
Greebo said:
Why try and guess though? In a few hours we will know but oh no " to the internet it must be Isis" sigh
Click to expand...

not sure anyone has been as specific as suggesting it was ISIS, but yes an Islamic group of some sort would seem to be the obvious contender

of course that may not be the case, but people tend to speculate on various news stories, it is hardly a phenomenon confined to terror attacks, there was a thread posted earlier about a thames water fine and people were speculating over whether the customers would have it passed to them
 
TwsT said:
No I believe that everyone is capable even in times of war when the evidence looks 100% obvious of getting it wrong. (In short I'm not going to say who i think is responsible or why they did it, I feel that it serves of no benefit to assume.)
Click to expand...

So in future yourself and greebo csn now be held to never ever make an assumption or guess and will only ever make statements of absolutle fact?
 
dowie said:
not sure anyone has been as specific as suggesting it was ISIS, but yes an Islamic group of some sort would seem to be the obvious contender
Click to expand...

Ok then any Islamic group. Nothing to be gained until we know more by just coming out and blaming them. People don't come back on later and say "sorry my racist and illogical views got in the way of facts, I'm sorry "
 
Terrible news about the poor woman who has died. Resports say others have "catastrophic" injuries :(
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom