And yet nothing else is more reliable than cash.What?
There are usually a dozen machines in a medium sized shop nowadays, without them all failing due to some connection issue, it shouldn't be a problem.
Regardless the only thing stopping digital currency usage is the government, they should make it a civil right to be able to process debit/credit either for free or subsidised when it comes to quick card payments.
Leaving the process to private enterprise is just going to end up with businesses eventually creating their own currencies.
And yet nothing else is more reliable than cash.
Tell that to Venezuelan's what? The black market isn't the only reason to want physical currency to stay around. It's about the reliability and there isn't really an argument against it.Tell that to Venezuelan's, they're only mildly comforted by the black market.
Saying that though, a digital currency wouldn't help there either, but it's still relevant.
Tell that to Venezuelan's what? The black market isn't the only reason to want physical currency to stay around. It's about the reliability and there isn't really an argument against it.
11p coins are definitely fake.They also changed the width of 5 and 11p coins by 11% just a few years ago and not all that many machines needed to be changed.
Apparently they are designed to reflect UV light in a specific way, so it will be very easy for banks (and vending machines etc in future) to spot any fakes. These could be nearly impossible to forge without the genuine machines and materials.
It's pay and display machines I work on. Wear/damage will be a big factor in the machine not accepting them, machine needing recalibrated, dirt in the coin sensor etc etcDo you calibrate parking ticket machines as well? - swear nearly every time I need to buy a ticket half of my real coins get rejected (I assume they are slightly worn and so don't meet the tolerances set)
It'll depend on the machine that initially accepts them, if it's only looking at diameter or width then it'll accept a lot of coins.And who decides they are fake? If the machine didnt pick up on it, does a person physically check every coin later? And the banks dont check them. They weigh that bags and thats it.
We have a coin machine and get about 1000 pound coins a month. They are all bagged and banked and never any rejected. When bagging them I do notice the odd very dodgy looking coin but bag it anyway. I very much doubt that out of 12,000 coins a year there arent quite a few fake ones.
Years ago I did hear that royal mint changed metal content of one pence coin and the payphones in schools were full of them - seems payphone thought it was a 20p coin -- BT had to go round programing them to ignore 20p coin![]()
Most I have seen are easily recognised but expect as long as they are the correct size/weight they arent distinguished by automated machines.
Yep, same that its currently legal to shoot a Scotman with a bow and arrow inside the walls of York.
And who decides they are fake? If the machine didnt pick up on it, does a person physically check every coin later? And the banks dont check them. They weigh that bags and thats it.
We have a coin machine and get about 1000 pound coins a month. They are all bagged and banked and never any rejected. When bagging them I do notice the odd very dodgy looking coin but bag it anyway. I very much doubt that out of 12,000 coins a year there arent quite a few fake ones.
That depends on the machine, which largely depends on its purpose and price. Machines intended to rapidly sort and count large numbers of coins probably won't distinguish fakes of the right size and weight from real coins. Often not even fakes of the right size but wrong weight, since sorting is often done solely by size and counting solely by simple sensors that will be triggered by pretty much anything opaque and even close to the right size. Automated machines made for a lower rate of coin handling can be far more discerning when it comes to fakes, even to the extent of detecting fakes that humans miss.
In both cases, more discerning equipment is more expensive, sometimes to the extent that it's cheaper to allow better fakes through than to buy the best coin mechs. For example, a low volume vending machine will probably have a less discerning coin mech than a fruit machine.
So, for example, my workplace has a sort/count machine that will sort and count mixed coinage at a startling rate. I'd estimate about 2Kg per second. It's very fast, very reliable, very accurate and not horribly expensive...but it'll pass anything that's opaque and the right diameter. At the other extreme are the mechs in the fruit machines, which have a coin handling rate low enough to be easily outpaced by a dextrous person feeding it one coin at a time and are rather expensive...but I've never known one accept a fake coin at all, ever.
Experts put the figure even higher, at closer to five per cent. They say the Royal Mint's own machinery can detect only 30% to 40% of fakes, whereas commercial machines can spot 70% of counterfeits.
Read more: http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/...The-fake-1-coin-conspiracy.html#ixzz4czgO76fO
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
That's an urban myth. There's no evidence of there ever having been any such law and there certainly isn't one now, not even one that isn't enforced.
A less implausible version of the myth is that there was at some point a local law allowing people in York to kill armed Scotsmen in the city, but there's no evidence for that either and it doesn't bear much scrutiny. The alleged reason is defence against the city being attacked, but obviously it would be legal to kill people attacking the city. There wouldn't be any reason to have an extra law about it. The idea that it was explicitly made legal in York to assume that any armed Scotsman was part of an invading army and to kill them is dubious at best without any evidence of any such law ever existing.
I wish we could just abolish physical currency. Apple/Android pay, contactless cards, it should be enough. It's 2017.