• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

Poll: ** The AMD VEGA Thread **

On or off the hype train?

  • (off) Train has derailed

    Votes: 207 39.2%
  • (on) Overcrowding, standing room only

    Votes: 100 18.9%
  • (never ever got on) Chinese escalator

    Votes: 221 41.9%

  • Total voters
    528
Status
Not open for further replies.
Just curious, where did they market the FE edition at gamers? All I see in any of the marketing is for work related stuff like game development, handling large datasets etc.

All I have seen from the gaming side of things is that, yes you can game on it, but if you are a gamer wait for Rx Vega.
They explicitly compared FE performance to FuryX performance at the launch (not the RX), plus there's a link to gaming drivers on the AMD website (albeit at the moment there is only one driver that covers everything).

They talk about the card as primarily being a development card that can be used for gaming which is fair enough, but when you through in comparisons to the FuryX and specifically talk about drivers for games then there's a clear blurring of the boundary. They shouldn't have done that and it certainly has helped create the PR disaster that has ensued.

Is the FE fundamentally different to the RX? We're being told that it's essentially the RX but with 16GB of RAM plus additional features in software to enable the pro features to command a higher price so are we in the same position yet again where the gaming drivers are shoddy for release or is it just not that great?
 
Although it does appear that the tiling rasteriser is not enabled in drivers yet.
1vUrQ2K.gif

Actually that shows it is :)

This explains it....

https://youtu.be/Nc6R1hwXhL8?t=7m8s

Again, i watched the stream, i know what was said and what was done. the conclution there was it was working. :)
 
As for the 290/290x, they are fantastic cards still, just look at how well they are performing 4+ years later.....

Compared to the 780ti which released 2 weeks after the 290x and sat roughly 10% ahead of it in most game tests at the time, For today's games the 290x is miles ahead of the 780ti.
 
Actually that shows it is :)

This explains it....

https://youtu.be/Nc6R1hwXhL8?t=7m8s

Again, i watched the stream, i know what was said and what was done. the conclution there was it was working. :)

fiji has exactly the same rendering pattern, when you tile rasterise, you render everything in a tile before moving onto the next, you don't scan across each individual layer at a time.

you also went to the wrong part of the video, this is the tiled rasterisation part.
https://youtu.be/Nc6R1hwXhL8?t=666
 
Nope sorry, folks at Beyond 3D tested with Fiji cards. It renders out the exact same as Vega. Fiji doesn't have tilebased rasterization and PcPer are waiting for AMD to get back to them about it.


https://gfycat.com/InsecureEagerKingbird

Well, in the stream they concluded it was working.

If you look at this you they demonstrate what normal rasterization looks like on AMD GPU's, its clearly one at a time from side to side, the tiled rasterization on Maxwell is up - down in tiles
https://youtu.be/Nc6R1hwXhL8?t=7m8s

The maxwell rasterization looks exactly the same as what you are looking at on Ryans screen, watch the video :)
 
Well, in the stream they concluded it was working.

If you look at this you they demonstrate what normal rasterization looks like on AMD GPU's, its clearly one at a time from side to side, the tiled rasterization on Maxwell is up - down in tiles
https://youtu.be/Nc6R1hwXhL8?t=7m8s

The maxwell rasterization looks exactly the same as what you are looking at on Ryans screen, what the video :)


Also, AMD were perfectly happy for Ryan to showcase FE gaming.

actually they pretty much asked him not to benchmark games as its not for gaming. he even said that himself in the stream.
 
Demo it showing what it can do isn't the same has its mean focus.
RX main focus is gaming
FE main focus is creation, the gaming part is simply for testing. But it can game like AMD said.
It won't have the game to game ready drivers that the gaming line up get.

I've already mentioned that if gaming is the priority get the RX.

Humbug said you can't game on the FE and AMD never mentioned that you could game on it.

You'll have to go back a few pages to see when Humbug dropped into the thread to wind people up :p
 
But that doesn't have to have anything to do with performance, it could simply be price wise.

To quote Raja

"Consumer RX will be much better optimized for all the top gaming titles and flavors of RX Vega will actually be faster than Frontier version!"

So not just top tier RX will be faster than FE in gaming. You'd have to be an idiot to buy FE for gaming when even AMD are telling everyone it will be slower in gaming.
 
Well, in the stream they concluded it was working.

If you look at this you they demonstrate what normal rasterization looks like on AMD GPU's, its clearly one at a time from side to side, the tiled rasterization on Maxwell is up - down in tiles
https://youtu.be/Nc6R1hwXhL8?t=7m8s

The maxwell rasterization looks exactly the same as what you are looking at on Ryans screen, what the video :)

That test was with a Terrascale card, the 6670, NOT GCN.
http://www.realworldtech.com/tile-based-rasterization-nvidia-gpus/

PjzkipcDT0_ij-3QPbQckg.png


If PcPer confirmed it working, why did they ask AMD and are waiting for a reply?

Why does vega then also rasterize the exact same way as Fiji does?

https://gfycat.com/InsecureEagerKingbird

The Maxwell screen looks nothing like the Vega screen....
 
To quote Raja

"Consumer RX will be much better optimized for all the top gaming titles and flavors of RX Vega will actually be faster than Frontier version!"

So not just top tier RX will be faster than FE in gaming. You'd have to be an idiot to buy FE for gaming when even AMD are telling everyone it will be slower in gaming.

Ah the famous "optimized" again. But fair enough, although given the consumer RX Vega's meant to have better clocks, they could be exactly the same bar clocks and the RX would be faster and cheaper.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom