Number of children being referred to gender identity clinics has quadrupled in five years

I could be wrong and happy to be educated, but why does it seem to predominantly effect males? I.e you seem to have more males transgendering to females than the other way and by some margin it seems.
My guess would be it's something to do with how babies develop in the womb, but I could be way off track with that.
 
My guess would be it's something to do with how babies develop in the womb, but I could be way off track with that.

Makes sense, Males are also generally more vulnerable to genetic problems because we only have one X chromosome (And therefore only one version of the genes therein contained)

Males have more extremes (EH Smarter at the Smart end, Dumber at the Dumb end (the SD for IQ score is slightly larger for males, only a point or so, but enough to make a big difference to numbers once you are 3SD away from the mean))
 
insisting that trans women be able to compete in sports against biogical women when the former will a have a notable advantage, on average, over biological women due to growing up with male hormones and with a largely male anatomy

Currently a hot topic for UFC, watching a Trans MtF fighter, just ******* destroy all the other women, would be a little stupid.
 
Honestly, I find transgenderism to be quite odd. Hard to get my head around.

Partly, it runs contrary to my views on boys/girls in terms of how we teach each of them to adhere to societal norms: nature vs nurture. A person who feels so defined by their gender as to be willing to undertake major surgical intervention, or otherwise live in misery/depression in the 'wrong body'. It's hard to reconcile with my feminist sympathies.

Why? Feminism requires believing that a person's sex is the most important thing about them, that it defines them and is their identity. It's impossible to advocate for one sex without that belief - you have to treat female people as one group identity and male people as one group identity in order to be able to advocate for one sex as one group. So people feeling so defined by their sex as to perceive themselves as having the wrong body and be willing to undertake major surgical intervention to change it fits perfectly with feminism. The only aspect of it that might be difficult for a feminist to reconcile is the question of whether or not someone who was born male can become female.

I find it hard to reconcile with my egalitarian sympathies. I think a person's sex is irrelevant in almost all circumstances and is a trivial part of their identity. So I think people who make a big deal out of it are wrong. On the other hand, transexuals aren't generally promoting sexism and sexism isn't an inherent part of transexualism. So I also think they're not wrong.

On the other hand, and more importantly, it's certainly a real thing - in terms of the effect on the individual, and it certainly isn't something that's any business of mine to condemn. Regardless of its odd place in the gender roles argument, I have no issue accepting people's wish to transition or to be of fluid gender / gender-queer etc.

It's real to them, so I'm fine with it as long as they keep it personal rather than political(*) and don't use it for promoting sexism.

Gender is a different kettle of fish. I disagree with the whole idea of gender and welcome people weakening it by not conforming to it. I was recently told by a drag queen (talking about wearing feminine clothing) that I "never take mine off", i.e. I always have a rather feminine gender. They're probably right about that.

I'd imagine an increase in children being referred to gender identity clinics is less to do with a 'fashion' movement toward such, and rather more to do with wider awareness and acceptance.

Why?

There have been transgender people for thousands of years. It's not a new concept.

Transexual people are a new thing, though. But probably only because it's only recently become possible.




* A good rule of thumb is that if a person is advocating something for themself it's personal and if they're advocating it for other people it's political.
 
I could be wrong and happy to be educated, but why does it seem to predominantly effect males? I.e you seem to have more males transgendering to females than the other way and by some margin it seems.

No hard evidence as far as I know. It might be genetic, connected in some way to not have 2 copies of the genes on X. It might be epigenetic, connected in some way to maternal hormone levels during gestation (which will, of course, be a feminine mix). It might be social, since female people in many places nowadays have far greater gender freedom than male people do. Or maybe it's some mixture of those things. Nature and nurture aren't always mutually exclusive.

Damn, it's hard to type quickly and accurately when even slightly drunk.
 
Yup, I always like the side effect listed on olanzapene "may cause sudden unexplained death".


Surely if its cause sit its not unexplained :p

Heh, I haven't seen that one. It does seem a bit odd - "this is the explanation that isn't an explanation" :)

I suppose what they mean is that they don't know the details of how it kills some people.

I was on venlafaxine. I read the potential side effects much later, when I started caring. I was fortunate - I didn't have any of them.
 
Ahh you assumed. Tut tut.

Kids shouldn't be taught complex gender issues at such a young age, to cause confusion, to such a degree that they need counselling/support.

Now you're trying to trap me. Like before ;). You just think i don't notice.

I'm not trying to trap you at all. I asked if you you were convinced now that this clinic was needed, you specifically said not for kids. No assumption there.

Putting aside the question of whether kids have gender issues because they are taught it or not, do you think kids that do have them should be able to get help at a clinic specifically set up to help in those situations. It's not a trap, is a simple question, especially when the OP is about a specific clinic.
 
Do you really want a muscular bearded trans man in a female prison, toilets or changing room?



Where do you get the idea that surgery is being performed on children?


No I don't want bearded biological men in women's toilets, prisons or changing rooms! That's the point!

Surgery is already being performed on children....

www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/38218115

Edit : as has been correctly pointed out further down the thread the above link actually relates to a biologically intersex child and not a trans one. As such I was wrong and made a mistake in not checking it further before posting. I am fully aware of the difference between one intersex and trans and ironically would often accuse the trans lobby of confusing the issue msking reference to the existence of intersex people to argue for trans issues when they are not the same... For the record I support carefully considered surgical intervention for intersex children in limited cases but with the default being, where possible, to defer any action until adulthood


My post said 'advocate' for.....
Surgery isn't legal in the UK till your 18 but there are calls to lower this and children are already prescribed hormones and blockers...

https://www.theguardian.com/society...s-doctor-prescribing-sex-hormones-children-uk
 
Last edited:
It's always a shame when people don't actually read the links they provide

Surgery is already being performed on children....

www.bbc.co.uk/news/amp/38218115

Surgery is being performed on an intersex child - it's a defining of gender, not a change.

People with a combination of sex characteristics are called intersex

The Family Court heard Carla was born with female-appearing genitalia and exhibited "stereotypically female" behaviour

Court documents seen by the BBC show medical experts testified that surgery would remove the risk of Carla developing tumours and that she had no certainty of future fertility. The surgery should happen before puberty, they said



My post said 'advocate' for.....
Surgery isn't legal in the UK till your 18 but there are calls to lower this and children are already prescribed hormones and blockers...

https://www.theguardian.com/society...s-doctor-prescribing-sex-hormones-children-uk

By a private clinic. Not the NHS. And the calls are to lower the age that cross sex hormones are given.

As charities call for NHS to lower age limit of 16 for hormones, parents are taking their children to private clinics for treatment

NHS England is reviewing its guidance about the age at which hormones can be prescribed
 
No I don't want bearded biological men in women's toilets, prisons or changing rooms! That's the point!

You're missing my point entirely. I'm talking about what you'd describe as a biological woman who has transitioned to a man and is receiving hormone therapy. Testosterone makes it possible for trans men to grow beard and to gain a lot of muscle mass.

Do you really want a muscular bearded trans man sharing the bathroom with your daughter? You're going to get a hell of lot more questions from your daughter in that instance than if trans women are using the women's bathroom.
 
You're missing my point entirely. I'm talking about what you'd describe as a biological woman who has transitioned to a man and is receiving hormone therapy. Testosterone makes it possible for trans men to grow beard and to gain a lot of muscle mass.

Do you really want a muscular bearded trans man sharing the bathroom with your daughter? You're going to get a hell of lot more questions from your daughter in that instance than if trans women are using the women's bathroom.
A FtM trans person still isn't in the same league strength or build wise as a biological man, that's what he's getting at I believe. Maybe if they spent their whole puberty under hormone therapy they would be equal. There are vast differences in strength, bone density muscle composition etc... in biological males and females that cannot be overcome by hormone therapy after puberty. That obviously unhinged UFC fighter destroying women for example.
 
And here's you thinking that this isn't an issue that merits their time and money.

Many people (Possibly even most) are perplexed that an NHS that wont give people cataract treatment until they have practically gone blind (And will then only do one eye) nevertheless feels it appropriate giving cosmetic surgery to deranged people. :/
 
Many people (Possibly even most) are perplexed that an NHS that wont give people cataract treatment until they have practically gone blind (And will then only do one eye) nevertheless feels it appropriate giving cosmetic surgery to deranged people. :/

this is going to increasingly become a problem as new and expensive treatments for various issues are created, even if you substantially increase NHS funding there will still be these issues and frankly even more so in future as the population lives even longer, having insurance or some cash saved up to give you the ability to pay for private treatment could well become more important in future
 
Many people (Possibly even most) are perplexed that an NHS that wont give people cataract treatment until they have practically gone blind (And will then only do one eye) nevertheless feels it appropriate giving cosmetic surgery to deranged people. :/
Deranged? Nice. Any other mental health issues you'd like to dismiss as deranged while you're on a roll?
 
DEYujd8W0AAcFoT.jpg:large
 
Back
Top Bottom