Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Rtg is important for apus so i doubt they will sell it completely. Maybe certain parts of it, especially the ones that are associated with dgpu market
I'm really curious to see what the price difference is between the water and air cooled full fat die. The difference in the frontier edition is £700! They either massively inflated the price as it was a prosumer card or the watercooled Vega is going miss the reasonable pricing mark by miles.
The price of the water cooled RX needs to be a lot less than the difference between the FE air and FE water.
I think Apu's will eventually become pretty potent.
let me try to answer this logically.
there are 2 kinds of stakeholders the management & shareholders
for the management rtg is like a defensive shield.. its something that will keep them afloat when the intel juggernaut is moving at the speed of light
for shareholders.. rtg is a value store
under less than ideal conditions... the shareholders will approach the board with a proposal to evaluate a possible sell-off of rtg..they might even knock at the door with an offer.. so what happens then is that the board will independently evaluate the offer
basically the exercise deals with comparing the value of a) rtg as a part of amd vs b) the value of rtg as a standalone unit or maybe part of another well funded organization (the offer)
if "b" is found to be greater than "a" - it would immediately reflect in the share price of amd which will go up few notches, these things get leaked much faster than vega launch dates (which can also be interpreted as an informal approval from shareholders)
so now the question is: whether whats happening now can be termed less than ideal conditions for rtg?
also every large organization has a strategy and development team who are actually paid to look at all scenarios even what some people might consider as brainless...
Edit: sorry i trolled.. will strictly limit my discussions to vega henceforth![]()
Problem is the profitability for AMD - sure someone can say the money for that will come from elsewhere in the business - but declining profitably will just see less and less investment from other parts of the business. It won't be long until 1080 ballpark performance seems distinctly last generation mid-range as well.
nVidia only needs to release a (proper) refresh at this point to squeeze them into having to price Vega down another tier as well and they really can't afford that. Unless RX Vega has waay better performance than is being thought at this point its going to be one of the shortest life cycle products in GPU history.
They don't care how many they sell for gaming.
Thats only coming out for those few Freesync owners, who say they can't get Nvidia for having that.
They are in the Pro and Machine Learning market (FE and Instinct Vega cards), as thats where the money is for them, its not in the gaming, as tery are going to make bugger all on the gaming.
I downgraded twice in the last 3 months. Went from a 1080 to a Nano, then finally ended up with a 7970, enjoying every game I wanted to play and making a very nice three figure profit in the processI just can not see, all those that have been on that peformance, and higher, for over a year now, sidegrading or downgrading to a card, that even sucks way more power.
Not me mate. I could easily run Vega in crossfire with my PSU. Not that I would, I will leave crossfire alone for you to enjoyYeah, but if your going to side/downgrade from a 1080/Ti, you're going to have to get a new PSU as well, at a much higher wattage
Just about everyone whos going to go for a Vega, is going to have to factor in the cost of a new PSU as well.
They could do a Vega and PSU bundle![]()