They're nearly all the same. Any agent that has an in demand player will leverage that fact to make as much money for himself and his client. In regards to Tombstone's point, I can't see in this case the agents getting paid much if anything at all, above their typical commission they receive from their client - there just isn't the demand for either player for the agent to get paid that extra cash.Not all agents are like that. Raiola and co give them a bad name.
Be interesting to see how Morata does in comparison to Lukaku.![]()
Can Pep ever win anything without breaking the bank ?
£80mil on those two is hilarious, especially when they dont have a lb.
Stoke have lost a good player there.£24 mill fee agreed with west ham for Marko Arnautovic.
Sad to see him go, he's a match winner and unplayable on his day. Im a bit annoyed how he handled this transfer by submitting a transfer request and especially to West Ham who yes are a bigger club than us, but thrankly equal to us in a football sense, I think he is also better than that, could play at a Europa league or champions league level (not in the EPL)
I guess west ham will double his stoke wages (currently 70k)
Is it confirmed now? I know it was getting discussed. Good if so saves us losing mane and salah for a monthNot strictly transfer talk but the Afcon is being moved to June/July.
I wouldn't consider either a thoroughbred.Aye, a comparison of a thoroughbred and a carthorse will be very interesting.![]()
Nope, he is one of the new bunch of managers that people revere as great managers , but who only ever win anything with teams already at the top and by just splashing cash. You'll never see them dragging a midtable team up through the ranks to win a title on a threadbare budget.
I wouldn't consider either a thoroughbred.
Can you have thoroughbred donkeys?Is that because neither is a horse?