Summer Transfer Window 2017/18 - Rumours & Signings
- Thread starter BaZ87
- Start date
Yeah, of course i'm serious. He'd score and assist more in that Barca side than those 2 currently do, Coutinho is slightly limited due being at Liverpool and in a more competitive league, it would be a breeze at Barca in comparison to here.
well, i've given a couple of examples. it's not my fault you refuse to buy into it
Where have you given examples as to why the world cup would be a factor in his decision to push for a move?
He's saying because he'd be less likely to be injured, which, i can see what he's saying. Whether it's as a bigger factor as he thinks is another question, only Coutinho could really answer that, the logic is there though
Unless I'm mistaken, Suarez didn't missed a single game for Liverpool through injury but has missed 3 games for Barca. You're clearly more likely to get injured playing for Barca than Liverpool
Soldato
- Joined
- 6 Jun 2009
- Posts
- 5,474
- Location
- No Mans Land
Just seen that Neymar will be on £782,000 a week!
Wow that's some serious money for just one player. Totally bonkers!
Wow that's some serious money for just one player. Totally bonkers!
I think you were giving cm a bit too much credit anyway. I don't think his Adam comment had anything to do with missing the world cup through injury, it was just a general rant over Adam's history of injuring Spurs players.
Lol
But Neymar?? Ermm wow just wow, football has officially gone bonkers. Earlier this summer City paid £50mill for Walker
then Utd decided to ***** £90 mill on Lukaku. And now Barca sell PSG Neymar for almost £200mill
Geezus ******* Christ absolutely crazy lol.
Will he win the CL with PSG?? Not sure if they will but then he wasn't winning it with Barca either. But he will win the poor ligue 1 title for sure
So long gone are those days when you can bargain basement players for cheap prices.
Oh well Wenger better start spending more money in the next few yrs lol.
We paid £75m for the second top scorer in the PL last season who is a proven PL goal scorer. Did you forget about Arsenal spending £46m on a striker who isn't as good as Lukaku, is 2 years older and the jury is out on whether he will adapt to the PL. I know which one I would rather have.
In one sense it could be said to be £85m including the loss of the £10m fee for paying off Rooney, but even then imo its worth it given his familiarity with the EPL.
In one sense I still regret RM playing such hard ball over Morata - his European experience would have been exceptionally helpful, but ce la vie.
Would take Lukaku over Lacezette any day.
Caporegime
- Joined
- 9 Mar 2006
- Posts
- 58,785
- Location
- Surrey
In another sense it could be said to be £65m given we got rid of Rooney too.
That is the definition of priceless. Getting rid of him would have been good enough for me but also getting rid of his massively massively ridiculous wages is almost as important. I imagine that Rooneys wages have paid for the wages of all three of our signings easily. ******* David Moyes.