Interestingly enough, I've just been watching/reading about YouTube's (Google's) new "restricted mode". Essentially, they are putting all videos from certain right-wing/conservative vloggers on a "restricted list", forcing people to sign in and age-verify before they can watch it.
In another worrying move, YouTube is automatically unsubscribing children and teens from channels with right-wing/conservative content.
And now people are asking, "Should we let Google decide what we should be watching?"
What happened to choices whether one agrees or disagrees? Will choice be no more?
Because traditionally female-dominated occupations tend to be underpaid for the level of intelligence and effort required?
Google doesn't have quotas.
Also, "hiring the best person for the job" isn't as simple as it sounds. Google is notorious for putting candidates through a dozen or so interview rounds but they've still encountered recruitment problems. Interviewers subconsciously favour candidates who remind them of themselves. Questions can unfairly favour some candidates over others.
The assumption that, without a diversity policy, companies hire the best person for the job is simply not true. Hiring the best person for the job is a complex and difficult task.
In a world that craves quick and the easy way.
