just proving that if he wanted he could have kill a lot more people with out using a gun.That wasn't my question
just proving that if he wanted he could have kill a lot more people with out using a gun.That wasn't my question
just proving that if he wanted he could have kill a lot more people with out using a gun.
just proving that if he wanted he could have kill a lot more people with out using a gun.
How exactly? Killing 58 people with a bomb is no mean feat.Home made bomb planted in hotel could have killed a lot more.
Mental illness thenNote I'm not saying this particular guy could be a muslim (I mean technically he could be but given what we know it doesn't seem likely) but the other poster is adamant that 'a' mass murderer doing something like this would be mentally ill and that doesn't have to be the case - belief in something like Islam (just for example) could lead to someone being radicalised and doing something like this without the need for them to be mentally ill. I'm simply pointing out that people throw around these mental illness ideas when there are plenty of people who have conducted mass killing events who generally aren't.
Out of interest what do you non CT's think of the Church report or all the other clandestine/illegal activities the intellegence agencies have been proved to be involved in and how did building 7 come down so cleanly and mysteriously?
You seem offended that people in this day and age assume mass killings might be related to Islamic terrorism and I'm not quite sure why, given the amount of mass killings that group has committed over the past few years, it seems at least reasonable that it definitely could be ISIS or similar
https://www.infowars.com/second-sho...s-vegas-gunfire-did-not-come-from-32nd-story/
The video embedded in the link shows the shooter firing from the window, look at the middle sign of the building by the blue part to the left. You see the gun flashing as it is firing.
Not sure if there was really a second shooter or not, but this is the first video I seen where you can see him firing, it's more likely he just changed floors to fire from, maybe even rented more then one room.
The video embedded in the link shows the shooter firing from the window, look at the middle sign of the building by the blue part to the left. You see the gun flashing as it is firing.
Not sure if there was really a second shooter or not, but this is the first video I seen where you can see him firing, it's more likely he just changed floors to fire from, maybe even rented more then one room.
So California having tigher laws than nevada who have basically just a background check, no restriction on fully automatic , capacity etc.
California has seen a significant decrease in their gun crime
If they are going to tackle this seriously it's going to have to be across all states surely.
Stop citing discredited news sources to push your conspiratorial agenda.
That flickering at the window continues even when the firing has stopped - don't think that is the shooter's position.
Only the first volley of shots is possibly two people shooting at the same time - could just be weird acoustics or one shooter dual wielding. I'm guessing he shot from one window first possibly with two weapons but then for whatever reason relocated to the second position - maybe had a better vantage point of the fleeing crowds or something.
Bit odd how he shot himself in his room before police arrived - though you can't really know what kind of impact something like that has mentally - but from the reports he was heavily prepared so doesn't make much sense - I did fleetingly wonder if he was setup and someone else was the shooter and left the body to cover their tracks - but I'd imagine that would come out in forensics.
Yes, the sound and video are not in sync, please remember this is being taken with a mobile phone and the distance between the person recording and the shooting.