I think if someone breaks in and gets shot or stabbed or whatever it's on them. You take that risk when you break into someones house.
Spot on.
I think if someone breaks in and gets shot or stabbed or whatever it's on them. You take that risk when you break into someones house.
BBC says otherwisebut he's been charged with GBH not murder or manslaughter, the stabbing is the reason for the arrest
BBC says otherwise
"A 78-year-old man has been arrested on suspicion of murder after a suspected burglar was stabbed to death."
just no, arrested which means he has more protection in the interview while police determine exactly what happens. CPS will decide to charge or not. If cps decide to go to court and the events are whats posted then you can be outraged. Until that happens, it is far better to be arrested and questioned with counsel etc.Arrested for defending his home? great job.
I think if someone breaks in and gets shot or stabbed or whatever it's on them. You take that risk when you break into someones house.
what utter nonsense, so you agree and support everything your family does? what an utterly stupid post.The victims family should have to pay to have the blood cleaned from the old man's carpet and issue an apology on behalf of the deceased for putting the old man through that ordeal in my opinion
The victims family should have to pay to have the blood cleaned from the old man's carpet and issue an apology on behalf of the deceased for putting the old man through that ordeal in my opinion
I'd hope there is something more to come out about the circumstances, suspicion of murder seems an odd one based on the current reports. GBH or manslaughter would be understandable but changing to murder after a morning in custody implies there is a bit more going on that we're not privy to yet.
what utter nonsense, so you agree and support everything your family does? what an utterly stupid post.
This is so sad, poor old man did nothing but defend himself. The law needs to change on this, big time.
but devils advocate might say that the screw driver wasn't intended as a weapon but simply as a tool to gain access.
So he was unlawfully arrested, or are the police/CPS allowed to flagrantly disregard High Court rulings?In a landmark case last year the High Court ruled that householders can use a disproportionate level of force against an intruder in their homes if they reasonably believe it is necessary.
You still have to question someone to ascertain what they thought was reasonably believed to be necessary (and why).So he was unlawfully arrested, or are the police/CPS allowed to flagrantly disregard High Court rulings?