Morgan Freeman accused of sexual harassment

It really is rather worrying that so many people in here display the inability to differentiate between looking at, commenting on, flirting with, chatting up a (good looking) woman and sexual harrassment.
 
Too many people see a touch as abuse. It's laughable. It might be inappropriate but it is not abuse. The whole #metoo train has been a farce :/
 
Too many people see a touch as abuse. It's laughable. It might be inappropriate but it is not abuse. The whole #metoo train has been a farce :/

Excellent, I guess I can touch all your daughter's when they hit 16 if that's not abuse?

According to this thread they are probably asking for it anyway if they are wearing skimpy outfits...."sexual encouragement"
 
Depends what you mean by touch though doesn't it?

If you mean touch their arm while flirting, then no, no-one thinks that's abuse.

If you mean grab them by the *****, then yes, amazingly some people still think that's not abuse.
 
Depends what you mean by touch though doesn't it?

If you mean touch their arm while flirting, then no, no-one thinks that's abuse.

If you mean grab them by the *****, then yes, amazingly some people still think that's not abuse.


What's the difference between buttock skin and arm skin though? Surely that difference is only in your head.

Personally I've seen a lot of arse in my time and I don't see any difference. A fully naked woman could walk passed me and I wouldn't even flinch lol.



The only reason it's "abuse" is because people are being told to take touching as abuse and are being sensitised to everything. Everyone is being brainwashed into becoming sensitive to everything when we should be trying to desensitise lol.



Also abuse is such a pointless word. It assumes there's a legitimate way to "use" the object in case, but only certain things turn it into "ab" use.

I mean its good to say I'm abusing a fountain pen by scribbling because you can still use a fountain pen without abusing it. But how can you righteously use another human being without abusing it?
 
So you say there's a difference between arm skin and buttock skin.

Then someone asks you to define the difference between buttock skin and arm skin.

Then you suddenly lose an IQ.

Amazing. :D
 
I think I lost a point of IQ reading that....:confused:


It's Asim, you need to shield yourself when engaging with him or he'll suck all your braincells dry.

So you say there's a difference between arm skin and buttock skin.

Then someone asks you to define the difference between buttock skin and arm skin.

Then you suddenly lose an IQ.

Amazing. :D

Are you genuinely missing the point here? If so that's incredibly interesting.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Are you genuinely missing the point here? If so that's incredibly interesting.

Maybe people could simply reiterate rather than posting garbage like "OMG I LOST AN IQ LOL"

Are you missing my point?

Some people think feet are sexual. Next you'll be telling me slapping someone's foot is some sort of sex abuse. You don't understand how sexual objectification is contained inside the person's head itself?

If we don't fix these silly thought processes now, in 25 years time looking at a woman's foot on the london underground will be considered some sort of abuse.

What is actually painful/objectionable here? The mere touching of the foot/arm/arse or the fact that the other party may have been gratified from it?


So you were talking about arse vs arm. Now lets bring in a foot shall we.

Is touching an arm the same as touching a foot for a person with a foot fetish? And if a person is getting sexual gratification from touching a foot then is it also abuse the same as touching a buttock? Is it only objectionable if the person thinks the foot is sexy? Therefore is it OK to touch buttock if the person touching it is not actually attracted to the arse?

I mean if you're going to try to define and establish boundaries then you need to make sure every variable is accounted for otherwise it's just going to fail.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
This is aimed at nobody in particular.


XGQQLKW.gif


Maybe people could simply reiterate rather than posting garbage like "OMG I LOST AN IQ LOL"

Are you missing my point?

Some people think feet are sexual. Next you'll be telling me slapping someone's foot is some sort of sex abuse. You don't understand how sexual objectification is contained inside the person's head itself?


I think there's a big difference between tapping someone on their person somewhere to tell them they've dropped their wallet and trying to fingerbang a bent over milf in the dairy aisle.


If you can't see the difference between these two, then you should probably just never interact with anyone ever again.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I think there's a big difference between tapping someone on their person somewhere to tell them they've dropped their wallet and trying to fingerbang a bent over milf in the dairy aisle.


If you can't see the difference between these two, then you should probably just never interact with anyone ever again.

Wow. Finally. Something resembling some sort of actual discussion as opposed to troll posts. Thank you so much.


Anyway. That is not what I'm talking about.

In both cases I describe, there is supposed to be a sexual motive from the person performing the touching. You have decided to turn one case into a innocent attention grabbing action.

I'm talking about 2 people. One who grabs someone's arse and one who grabs a foot, both for sexually motivated reasons. Should it be considered abuse to touch a foot if it's sexual, or should it be considered abuse to touch a foot anytime, because it could be sexually motivated? (these are actual questions btw)

What if one day "tapping someone on their person somewhere" starts to get deemed a sexual thing? I'm sure there are people out there who would see any touching anywhere as a sexual thing, the sort of people who've never had a girl friend maybe.
 
Wow. Finally. Something resembling some sort of actual discussion as opposed to troll posts. Thank you so much.


Anyway. That is not what I'm talking about.

In both cases I describe, there is supposed to be a sexual motive from the person performing the touching. You have decided to turn one case into a innocent attention grabbing action.

I'm talking about 2 people. One who grabs someone's arse and one who grabs a foot, both for sexually motivated reasons. Should it be considered abuse to touch a foot if it's sexual, or should it be considered abuse to touch a foot anytime, because it could be sexually motivated? (these are actual questions btw)

What if one day "tapping someone on their person somewhere" starts to get deemed a sexual thing? I'm sure there are people out there who would see any touching anywhere as a sexual thing, the sort of people who've never had a girl friend maybe.

Then we release the virus and exterminate all humanity cos we're ****** anyway.



Also, you are Purple Aki AICMFP.
 
I think it's just changing social norms. I find older women far less susceptible to a fit of the vapours from a bit of semi OTT flirting involving a few ribald comments and perhaps the odd flirtatious touching than many of the younger women these days. I see and hear far more risqué interaction in pubs between people of over 45 than the youngsters. In fact some youngsters behind bars are a bit of a PITA, a recent example was a new barmaid complaining to the landlord about how she overheard a private conversation about Brexit and how she was going to make some woman whose views she didn't agree with wait as long as possible to be served in future. She thought this hilarious and perfectly acceptable. The bar girl never showed again.... The landlord later told me that this is now commonplace and younger staff often actually complained to him about hearing views that they were not in agreement with, or hearing the odd ribald comment on their figure or short dress, and as such were unsuitable to work in his hostelry.

But as for flirting and banter, it seems to me anyone with any experience at all with dealing with the opposite sex should be able to sense what the person is becoming uncomfortable with things long before it becomes confrontational. I have a Portuguese friend who worked for BA for years as a (stunningly attractive) air hostess. She was and is expert at deflecting the more amorous gentlemen, especially if drink is involved, and has never had recourse to threatening legal action or even seeking assistance from fellow workers, her husband or anyone else. As she says, it's sad if a woman has to get all legalese about a man making unwanted advances. Obviously not full on assault, but a bit of drunken OTT talk, or a single unwanted touch to the bottom or leg. It's probably something that should be taught girls in schools, and probably is in a decent finishing school.
 
Man if you're not here to discuss or even post some actual opinion or answer some basic on-topic questions in my post then why even bother posting nonsense?

Trolls seems to be allowed to troll relentlessly here. It's so tedious.
 
Man if you're not here to discuss or even post some actual opinion or answer some basic on-topic questions in my post then why even bother posting nonsense?

Trolls seems to be allowed to troll relentlessly here. It's so tedious.

How the hell do you expect anyone to take you seriously when all your posts are hypothetical rubbish? You may as well start with "once upon a time" for all we care. It's not even just this one, it's literally every single discussion which is unfortunate enough to be subjected to your drivel. I genuinely think you have no idea how to interact with others based on your posts because everything is always "what if". It's tedious, boring, and anything which isn't pandering to your ridiculous nonsense is labelled as trolling so attempting to have an intelligent conversation with you is pointless before it's even begun.
 
Back
Top Bottom