Yes should be 1 in 15, not so funny though that wayI spotted that! Think I cut the number off when C&P![]()

Andi.
Yes should be 1 in 15, not so funny though that wayI spotted that! Think I cut the number off when C&P![]()
This thread on the RAC boards seems pertinent -
https://www.rac.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?1346-Provisional-with-6-points
That being said, Insurance would be prohibitory.
The same happens as when you get 6 points in the first two years and have to retake your tests. That leaves you in the position of having 6 points and taking your test too.I think it's because there's another qualifying part of that statement - that it's "Further points that take you up to a total of 6 or more"
So what happens when you're on 6 already?
Is it ambiguous or just comprehension fail?![]()
Took me 9 months before I got banned for reckless driving.
Mini with a Peco on 11'sCouldn't handle the Polo?
Well, licensed insured drivers hurt plenty of people tooAnd the victim is still covered by the MIB if he did have an accident. (No that's not justification in any way!)
I've just googled and I'm actually shocked at the numbers of unisured cars there are tbh!
Table one: League table of the UK’s top 10 uninsured vehicle hotspots
Area Percentage of vehicles that are uninsured Chance of vehicle involved in an accident being uninsured
Source: Churchill Car Insurance analysis of Motor Insurers’ Bureau data
- East London 13.4% 1 in 8
North London 9.3% 1 in 11
South East London 9.1% 1 in 11
Liverpool 7.9% 1 in 13
Bradford 7.6% 1 in 13
Manchester 7.4% 1 in 14
North West London 7.4% 1 in 14
Oldham 7.2% 1 in 14
Ilford 7.1% 1 in 14
East Central London 6.6% 1 in 1
https://www.churchill.com/press-office/releases/2016/uninsured-driving-hotspots-in-the-uk
lol, I mean over 6 and you get banned.
If those are really the numbers, should it not be a priority to crack down on? How hard can it be to put up a few more roadside cameras to nick people? I guess if the car is completely unregistered then it won't be easy to track down the offender. But if up to 1 in 8 cars are uninsured, surely the police just need sit in a layby and run checks on cars that drive past and follow offending ones?
i did the exact same thing at about the same age, ~25 years ago......never got caught but never did it again. still feel quilty about it to this day. just because you make a stupid mistake once doesn't mean you're a 'serial offender'Does make me wonder if this was the first time of many that he had taken the car?
Update He rang the DVLA and he can have a full licence but if even sneezes in the 1st 2 years while in a car he's back to a provisional So I've told him take your test asap and don't drive for 2 years well 4years really till 6 points fall off lol
He was pulled due to the police just doing a random check on the car after spotting two youngish lads driving at 2:30am , His friend has a full licence and was lucky not to be charged with anything at the time
I woke up in the morning and found the "your car has been seized" and a sorry note from him with his house key and he'd packed a suitcase ready to be evicted
If those are really the numbers, should it not be a priority to crack down on? How hard can it be to put up a few more roadside cameras to nick people? I guess if the car is completely unregistered then it won't be easy to track down the offender. But if up to 1 in 8 cars are uninsured, surely the police just need sit in a layby and run checks on cars that drive past and follow offending ones?
Oh fair point.It's uninsured drivers not cars.
i did the exact same thing at about the same age, ~25 years ago......never got caught but never did it again. still feel quilty about it to this day. just because you make a stupid mistake once doesn't mean you're a 'serial offender'