If AMD state 1080-level then expect 1070 and then you won't be disappointed.

Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
If AMD state 1080-level then expect 1070 and then you won't be disappointed.
There's even some of your skin on his latest jacketBut I am fool to to even bother, since this forum is full of Nvidia mujaheddin cows, happily wanting to get milked for the cause while giving even their skin for the new Jensens' leather jackets.![]()
In lala land perhaps?Although that is true, it's almost a criminal offense to post it. Stirs up the hive. To be fair to Nvidia they have the egde in power consumption, but yeah AMD outperform Nvidia at every tier except the GTX 1080 Ti. Just don't ever say it, unless you don't mind the backlash of comments xD
There's even some of your skin on his latest jacket![]()
In lala land perhaps?
There was no real availability to be found for the quoted $599 price at the actual launch though. That was almost just a MSRP for made up to be quoted by reviewers for the pre-launch review.1080 was $599 and $699 for the founders edition.
![]()
There was no real availability to be found for the quoted $599 price at the actual launch though.
If someone was to point out the FACT regarding misleading/bait and switch that Nvidia pulled with the GTX1030 GDDR5 to DDR4 memory after launch, GTX 1050 3GB and GTX1060 3GB with sneaky cut-down spec, are they pro AMD, haters against Nvidia got some agenda to push, despite it is totally of Nvidia's own doing...?There's people on this forum that say the complete opposite of whats been posted that generally have a pro AMD view and ignore anything postive about Nvidia. Its like they have some kind of agenda to push....
There were a lot of custom cards available for preorder in the $599 to $699 range on launch day. Can't remember what was actually available for purchase on launch day though.There was no real availability to be found for the quoted $599 price at the actual launch though. That was almost just a MSRP for made up to be quoted by reviewers for the pre-launch review.
Almost all 1080 available at launch was around the same ballpark as the Founder Edition pricing.
Yeah, i think that was the cheapest.I remember the clown cards being pretty cheap/close to RRP though.
The situation was pretty much Nvidia telling the AIB partners to sell their cards for cheaper while launching their own FE card high at $699, but most AIB probably thought it made no sense for them to sell their custom cooler cards that are better than FE for less, so they follow suit and more or less priced around the same price range as the FE price range.There were a lot of custom cards available for preorder in the $599 to $699 range on launch day. Can't remember what was actually available for purchase on launch day though.
In lala land perhaps?
1060 beats 580
https://www.patreon.com/posts/radeon-rx-580-vs-19635434
1080 beats V64
https://www.patreon.com/posts/radeon-rx-vega-20791677
1070Ti beats V56
1080Ti rules them all
![]()
Vega 64 air here with water bios and blocks. Best stable clocks I can get (I mean proper 24/7 all apps stable) is 1750/1055.
Vega 64 is for sure a few percent slower than the 1080, but I got it for the price of a 1070 at the time so cannot complain.
2080ti I will pick up though I think.
Had all the cards, VEGA 64 is much faster than GTX 1080. Is just a fact. He's cherry picked one set of benchmarks prob at launch to back up his theory. Sadly it's not the case, but blind ignorance is a theme here. Which was the point of my post to begin with. (You cannot post pro AMD without backlash) The irony is not lost on me.
Moving on ... Real or not??
Had all the cards, VEGA 64 is much faster than GTX 1080. Is just a fact. He's cherry picked one set of benchmarks prob at launch to back up his theory. Sadly it's not the case, but blind ignorance is a theme here. Which was the point of my post to begin with. (You cannot post pro AMD without backlash) The irony is not lost on me.
Moving on ... Real or not??
![]()
We sort of have no choice but to support a monopoly,