Well that’s alright as I only need something a little bit better than a 1080Ti!
I'm sure nVidia will eventually have something like that for you, for a grand and a half.

Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
Well that’s alright as I only need something a little bit better than a 1080Ti!
I'm sure nVidia will eventually have something like that for you, for a grand and a half.![]()
This is going to go the Intel CPU route - we'll get drip fed marginal performance increases from nVidia until someone comes along to rival them.
I’d be gobsmacked if we saw lower pricing.
We’ll see decent performance gains at current-ish pricing imo.
Ain't it the third party sellers that are raising the GPU's to crazy pricesI’d be gobsmacked if we saw lower pricing.
We’ll see decent performance gains at current-ish pricing imo.
Ain't it the third party sellers that are raising the GPU's to crazy prices
As there still listed for sale at the recommended release prices on NVidia website (IE £679 for a 1080ti with a Titan type cooler)...
It will/would be, like I said the current system has been in place since 2009. If they go from 1000 to 2000 instead of 1100 as is rumored it will break nearly a decade of continuous numbering conventions since the 100 series followed on from the 9000 series in 2009.
Lol. Come on now..Oh really
Lol. Come on now..
Nice necro, but time doesn't actually change things here as the post you quoted was pointing out that shifting to 2000 instead of 1100 would be a big change in naming convention and break from the numbering system Nvidia had used since 2009.Oh really
OH MY GOD!
You necroed a post that while accurate at the time based on available information was later proven wrong by hindsight! :O
50 Points To Gryffindor!
Jesus now THIS is what we really need, another 2*** thread to post in!!![]()
Yeah I noticed that and changed my response accordingly lol, I just automatically figured that if he was going to necro a thread that had been dead for five months he would do it to faux win an argument via hindsight not lose it xDNothing you said in your post was wrong though?
Jesus now THIS is what we really need, another 2*** thread to post in!!![]()
Hey, i once made a bet with AMDMatt and waited a year to call him out on it. He didnt pay up either.![]()
Nothing you said in your post was wrong though? They did break a naming scheme that was a decade old. But, we know why now, because they had to make a big jump in the numbers after the big jump in price.
Yes but following that logic the 4 digit system immediately before the 100 series followed the thousands increment, so it would be a continuation of a system thats been around since 2002
Sorry, should have included my response from then aswell;
They've never done a 100's increment in a 1000's system before so its the same system they've been using for 16 years.
No, they changed their system when they moved from the 9 series to the 100 series cards(even though the 100 series were only OEM parts) They made a lot of changes, they moved the GTX etc from after the numbers to before the numbers. eg. The 9800 GTX before the change. GTX 280 afterwards. And it wasn't 1000 increments. It wasn't 9 thousand, eight hundred. It was nine, eight hundred. The first digit was the series, the last 3 digits were the model numbers.