• Competitor rules

    Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.

looks like RTX "on" just got a nice boost in BF5

easyrider said:
I agree, people going giddy on a measly 64fps RT on at 1440p...even less at 3440x1440p

By the time the games are out we will be on the 3000 series gpu.
Click to expand...
73 FPS at 1440P now using medium RT, up from 61 for me when I was using low RT. Depends on map though, a few still around 62 :). While some are higher (80FPS+). That's ultra everything but medium RT although I think the difference between medium and ultra isn't much as I accidently had ultra set earlier when I tried to compare.
As for 115FPS what someone else said (cant play less than), a 1080 Ti wont be doing that at 1440P using DX12 with everything on ultra I don't think either.
It's great to use to be honest :). Roll on next gen too. IMO people are missing out by not giving it a try now :p.
 
Last edited:
DarrenM343 said:
73 FPS at 1440P now using medium RT, up from 61 for me when I was using low RT. Depends on map though, a few still around 62 :). While some are higher (80FPS+). That's ultra everything but medium RT although I think the difference between medium and ultra isn't much as I accidently had ultra set earlier when I tried to compare.
As for 115FPS what someone else said (cant play less than), a 1080 Ti wont be doing that at 1440P using DX12 with everything on ultra I don't think either.
It's great to use to be honest :). Roll on next gen too. IMO people are missing out by not giving it a try now :p.
Click to expand...

My 2080Ti does around 144hz on all ultra settings 1440p, depending on the map. Some more some slightly less. But usually it’s always around the 130-165hz mark on dx11.

Too much of a performance loss for me.
 
this stinks of Nvidia selling tactics. They knew this would be a hard sale at the price it was on so they held back RTX performance due to performance being poor. They release with really really poor performance and than they release a driver with poor performance that seems like good performance due to the shoddy performance of before. Result is aload of people fall over themselves to buy an RTX card!
 
DarrenM343 said:
73 FPS at 1440P now using medium RT, up from 61 for me when I was using low RT. Depends on map though, a few still around 62 :). While some are higher (80FPS+). That's ultra everything but medium RT although I think the difference between medium and ultra isn't much as I accidently had ultra set earlier when I tried to compare.
As for 115FPS what someone else said (cant play less than), a 1080 Ti wont be doing that at 1440P using DX12 with everything on ultra I don't think either.
It's great to use to be honest :). Roll on next gen too. IMO people are missing out by not giving it a try now :p.
Click to expand...

IMO I’m missing out on rubbish FPS for a premium cost.

Slant it how you like.
 
Gregster said:
I get as many frames per second playing BF5 with everything maxed as I do playing Crysis 3 with everything maxed. BF5 looks better also.
Click to expand...
Don't take no notice of him Gregster. As he happens to own a 100hz monitor currently, anything less than 100fps automatically becomes crap. In a few years when he upgrades, the bar will change yet again. End of the day only YOU can tell what YOU find perfectly playable to be playable.

I personally could not give a rats arse what anyone else says. There are those out there who consider 144fps to not be smooth and not good enough and won't play anything less than 240fps, does that mean people happily gaming at 100fps are wrong? Horses for courses, but he finds that hard to understand for some reason :p
 
TNA said:
Don't take no notice of him Gregster. As he happens to own a 100hz monitor currently, anything less than 100fps automatically becomes crap. In a few years when he upgrades, the bar will change yet again. End of the day only YOU can tell what YOU find perfectly playable to be playable.

I personally could not give a rats arse what anyone else says. There are those out there who consider 144fps to not be smooth and not good enough and won't play anything less than 240fps, does that mean people happily gaming at 100fps are wrong? Horses for courses, but he finds that hard to understand for some reason :p
Click to expand...

He is one of those people who believes that he is right about everything and that only his opinion matters, also comes across as arrogant and egotistical.
Otherwise known as a troll
 
TNA said:
Don't take no notice of him Gregster. As he happens to own a 100hz monitor currently, anything less than 100fps automatically becomes crap. In a few years when he upgrades, the bar will change yet again. End of the day only YOU can tell what YOU find perfectly playable to be playable.

I personally could not give a rats arse what anyone else says. There are those out there who consider 144fps to not be smooth and not good enough and won't play anything less than 240fps, does that mean people happily gaming at 100fps are wrong? Horses for courses, but he finds that hard to understand for some reason :p
Click to expand...
Agreed and if I find it smooth enough, that is good enough for me. He is like this, as he insisted on and put it so many times that "30 fps @ 1080P is lol" but clearly he is miles off and I played for quite a bit yesterday and frames were good enough for my liking. I love me some banter but watching Easy insisting he made the right choice by getting a 18 month old EOL card for £600 and then seeing him berate anything to do with RTX is the funniest thing yet :D
 
Gregster said:
Agreed and if I find it smooth enough, that is good enough for me. He is like this, as he insisted on and put it so many times that "30 fps @ 1080P is lol" but clearly he is miles off and I played for quite a bit yesterday and frames were good enough for my liking. I love me some banter but watching Easy insisting he made the right choice by getting a 18 month old EOL card for £600 and then seeing him berate anything to do with RTX is the funniest thing yet :D
Click to expand...

No spending £1300 for sub 60 fps gaming is the funniest thing yet. :)
 
DarrenM343 said:
So why did you buy the X34 predator? FPS killer and expensive too :). I don't understand the moaning about GPU prices if someone has paid a grand or more for the monitor that needs expensive GPU;s to drive well.
Click to expand...

I bought 2 x 27" dells for my recording studio. Few days later I sold them and bought a ultrawide. The ultrawide is perfect for a DAW and video editing is a revelation. I do more than game. The X34 ticked both boxes.
 
easyrider said:
You stated you were getting 40 FPS I can link if you have forgotten:p

Keep up! Your lies and constructed rhetoric will soon bite you in the **** :p
Click to expand...

Pre-patch. at least RTX owners have the option. e.g. I can play BFV no DXR at 1440p ultra >110fps or turn on DXR and get a perfectly playable >60fps. the £1300 card you slate so much is still a beast at non-DXR games. that won't change.
 
DrCrabHands said:
Pre-patch. at least RTX owners have the option. e.g. I can play BFV no DXR at 1440p ultra >110fps or turn on DXR and get a perfectly playable >60fps. the £1300 card you slate so much is still a beast at non-DXR games. that won't change.
Click to expand...

I know how fast the 2080ti is over a 1080ti...its 35%
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom