£1400 pc build advice please.

Associate
Joined
1 Aug 2014
Posts
271
Location
york
mate of mine recently came into some money. gotta love a generous santa.

he doesn't have an account on here so i thought id ask for your guys help since i don't know a lot about pcs, built mine ages ago (4 years ago?) and bet things have changed a lot.

hes got 2 monitors. both 1080p. he wants to stream on twitch and upload to youtube and play all sorts of games.

he only needs the tower, he has keyboard/speakers/mouse so £1400 is just for the tower.

i posted a while ago but he changed his mind but now is ready to get into pc gaming.

cheers for any help guys :)
 
Here is mine,

I picked the rtx 2070 over the vega 64, anyways according to this below the link, the rtx 2070 is a wee bit faster than the vega 64.

https://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-RTX-2070-vs-AMD-RX-Vega-64/4029vs3933

My basket at Overclockers UK:
Total: £1,240.54 (includes shipping: £11.70)


Anyways the reason why i picked a ryzen processor and a seasonic power supply at 750watts is all about future proofing and gives headroom with this power supply i selected just in case he gets a power hungry graphics card in the future or a processor upgrade as amd will support the am4 motherboard socket until 2020 as we are seeing the release of zen 2 or ryzen 3000 series next year and then after that zen 3 which is ryzen 4000 series.

Dan.​
 
Last edited:
To the op intel is the winner for 1080p gaming, but when you start to go up the resolution ladder for instance 1440p or 4k then it will tax/use the gpu much more than the processor, so a 2700x is ideal for this when pitted up against a 9900k when gaming at 4k resolution only 1-2 fps difference between the two processors.

Anyways... since the 3 of us recommend the amd processor, the amd route as i say offers value for performance over a stock intel processor that is not gonna be overclocked, but if overclocked it changes the scene like if you had a 9900k at 5ghz then it is a different ball game.

Yep also the amd route is defiantly more future proof because since the launch of ryzen and the am4 motherboard socket, they amd will support the am4 socket for 3 years since its launch at 2017 and until 2020.

This video goes on about the ryzen 1600 vs 7600k it will give you an idea why we are recommending ryzen processors.

If you look at all the benchmarks comparing intel processors and amd processors and studying all of them, it makes sense intel is the no brainer approach because of much higher frames per second okay, so if you look at a wall intel processors will have higher fps over ryzen, but if you look at a field etc with tons of explosions going on in crysis 3 then the ryzen will have the higher fps, also important that the game is using all of the cores/threads though.

Bit of a toss up between intel and amd processors.

If you watch this video it exposes where the strength of these ryzen processors are coming from.


https://forums.overclockers.co.uk/posts/32379305

But if your overclocking then it is intel processors all the way but i think and hopefully zen 2/ryzen 3000 series offers something or until zen 3/4000 series to combat this.

edit

It is imperative to know that these ryzen processors love fast ram so 3000/3200 mhz ram is ideal.

So yeah in crysis 3 between ryzen 1600 and 7600k, the ryzen absolutely stonks the 7600k with much higher min frame rates thanks to the extra cores and threads used giving it a much better smooth experiance the fps hardly changed when the processor was not taxed this much before the 7600k tanked in fps that is, but the 7600k has the much better max fps or high fps thanks to it's single threaded performance.

Overall the ryzen processor is the much powerful processor when compared to 7600k and shows it with the much higher min frame rate in crysis 3 but the ryzen processor lacks in single threaded performance imo, so the 7600k had much higher fps then the ryzen could ever achieve.

Like yin and yang, intel wins in max fps ( this is what most bench markers will show you vs ryzen processors), ryzen wins in min fps but the amd processor is much more consistent with the fps in crysis 3 which is why it is a smooth gaming experience, before and after it maintained a smooth gaming experiance of over 100fps before the explosion and 100fps after the explosion in crysis 3, but the intel 7600k processor fell/tanked from heaven with its glory of max fps to under 100fps by quite a margin like 62 fps thus the ryzen processor wins in that way.

Anyways this is a classic example between these processors and the land of intel vs amd so yeah.

As have said bit of a toss up between amd and intel.
 
Last edited:

Tweak on this

Pushing for gaming monitor

My basket at Overclockers UK:
Total: £1,397.69 (includes shipping: £15.90)​
 
Back
Top Bottom