Associate
- Joined
- 2 Jan 2019
- Posts
- 617
Absolutely nothing on Ryzen 3000. 
-
Competitor rules
Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
AMD Zen 2 (Ryzen 3000) - *** NO COMPETITOR HINTING ***
- Thread starter Jamin280672
- Start date
Associate
It's to early for a new Ryzen CPU series. Not even been a year since Ryzen 2000 Series.
I would say April/May for Series 3.
I would say April/May for Series 3.
Soldato
AMD shares are gonna tank lol.
Caporegime
God dammit. Thats a fail.
Deleted member 209350
D
Deleted member 209350
Maybe the mention of Epyc first, and end on the biggest info aka Ryzen 3000
Soldato
- Joined
- 19 Feb 2011
- Posts
- 5,849
Oh well onto CPU now so we might get some Zen2 infos!
Associate
- Joined
- 7 Apr 2017
- Posts
- 1,762
Well that was a total waste of time, nothing of any interest... They really had a great platform there and managed to completely **** the bed.
Soldato
Looks like I am buying a 9700k then. 
Can't wait another 6 months or more.
Can't wait another 6 months or more.Looks like I am buying a 9700k then.
You could probably wait until the end of the keynote though
Soldato
No we want the next gen to price correct after the massively inflated prices we've had to endure for the last 18-24 months.People really do want new tech for peanuts don’t they
Soldato
Caporegime
- Joined
- 18 Oct 2002
- Posts
- 30,036
See you at CEX people!! Only 6 months...
Soldato
Associate
Epyc gains at the moment. Translate to Ryzen 3000 please 
Soldato
Gotta love graphs with no Y axis scale...
Permabanned
Doing some measurements on our imagery of the processor, and knowing that an AM4 processor is 40mm square, we measure the chiplet to be 10.53 x 7.67 mm = 80.80 mm2, whereas the IO die is 13.16mm x 9.32 mm = 122.63 mm2.
+15% Performance Generation on Generation, Minimum.
During the keynote, AMD showed some performance numbers using the new Ryzen 3rd Generation (Matisse) processor. The test in question was Cinebench R15.
Our internal numbers show the 2nd Generation Ryzen 7 2700X scores 1754.
This new 3rd Generation Ryzen processor scored 2023.
This would mean that at current non-final clocks, the new parts give a 15.3% increase in performance generation on generation. Cinebench is an idealized situation for AMD, but this is not at final clocks either. It will depend on the workload, but this is an interesting data point to have.
Identical Performance to the Core i9-9900K, Minimum.
Our internal benchmarks show the 9900K with a score of 2032.
The 8-core AMD processor scored 2023, and the Intel Core i9-9900K scored 2042.
Both systems were running on strong air cooling, and we were told that the Core i9-9900K was allowed to run at its standard frequencies on an ASUS motherboard. The AMD chip, by contrast, was not running at final clocks. AMD said that both systems had identical power supplies, DRAM, SSDs, operating systems, patches, and both with a Vega 64 graphics card.
+15% Performance Generation on Generation, Minimum.
During the keynote, AMD showed some performance numbers using the new Ryzen 3rd Generation (Matisse) processor. The test in question was Cinebench R15.
Our internal numbers show the 2nd Generation Ryzen 7 2700X scores 1754.
This new 3rd Generation Ryzen processor scored 2023.
This would mean that at current non-final clocks, the new parts give a 15.3% increase in performance generation on generation. Cinebench is an idealized situation for AMD, but this is not at final clocks either. It will depend on the workload, but this is an interesting data point to have.
Identical Performance to the Core i9-9900K, Minimum.
Our internal benchmarks show the 9900K with a score of 2032.
The 8-core AMD processor scored 2023, and the Intel Core i9-9900K scored 2042.
Both systems were running on strong air cooling, and we were told that the Core i9-9900K was allowed to run at its standard frequencies on an ASUS motherboard. The AMD chip, by contrast, was not running at final clocks. AMD said that both systems had identical power supplies, DRAM, SSDs, operating systems, patches, and both with a Vega 64 graphics card.